Home Blog Page 92

End of an era: Habersham’s old courthouse faces final days

The old clock stopped keeping time long ago. Now time has run out for the old Habersham County Courthouse. (Jerry Neace/NowHabersham.com)

The brass clock on the old Habersham courthouse no longer works, but if it did, it would be ticking down the minutes to its demise. Crews are scheduled to start demolishing the courthouse on Monday, March 24, ending an era that began 60 years ago when the building was built.

Once the nerve center of Habersham County government and our rural way of life, the old courthouse on Monroe Street has sat vacant and decaying since 2018. A failing roof led to leaks and mold that have since made the facility uninhabitable and, until recently, unsellable.

Last month, the city of Clarkesville struck a deal with the county to buy the building and property for $1,000,000. The contract also included $190,000, which the city agreed to pay for demolition.

The countdown is on.

WATCH Video tour of the old Habersham County courthouse

A last look inside

When Monday rolls around, crews are scheduled to begin the abatement process to remove potentially lethal asbestos from the building. Once that is done, wrecking crews will begin tearing down the walls of what many have long considered the ugliest courthouse in Georgia.

Before the trashing and smashing begin, government representatives offered local media a chance to revisit the halls, courtrooms, and offices that were once an integral part of daily life in Habersham County. A team from Now Habersham and members of other local media outlets toured the facility one last time, equipped with breathing masks, cameras, and curiosity.

Over the years, county leaders have ignored the property, refusing to budget funds to maintain it. The years of neglect are evident. The paneling is peeling in the once stately courtroom with its high ceilings and wood veneer walls, and row after row of sturdy wood benches sit blackened with mold and rot.

Most of the offices are empty. Still, you can find the occasional office chair, desk, filing cabinet, and even a few documents. An old court calendar in one of the judges’ chambers dates back to 2013, and maps left in the old planning office are outdated.

A shared history

As the tour wound through the building, visitors’ footsteps bounced off the walls of the long-abandoned, echoey hallways, delivering a jolt of life to a facility long dead.

It wasn’t always like this.

For decades, the courthouse stood at the heart of this community. Citizens came here to vote, pay taxes, and make their voices heard at county commission meetings. They dug through old deed books, birth certificates, and death records, tracing property lines and family roots. Disputes were filed in the clerk’s office and settled in court, and at one point, inmates spent their days waving to passersby from the narrow windows of the old county jail on the third floor.

This old courthouse was the backdrop for some of life’s most pivotal moments. Couples married and families grew through adoption here. Dreams unraveled through the pain of divorce. Out on the lawn, ordinary lives were transformed into extraordinary service as military recruits and draftees boarded the Trailways bus, bound for duty. A war memorial sits near the old bus stop, where many began their journey, and some never returned.

With every step, the courthouse hallways echo life’s stories—some joyful, some sad—all woven into the fabric of a community that once passed through its doors.

These halls and walls will soon be gone, but the impact of what happened here will reverberate for generations. It may be the ugliest courthouse in Georgia, but it was ours, and it will always have a place in our shared history.

Now Habersham would like to thank the City of Clarkesville, Habersham County Government, Public Information Officer Ashlyn Brady, and Public Facilities Director Mike Bramlett for providing us the opportunity to tour the old courthouse one last time.

Habersham County budget review meetings set for this week

(NowHabersham.com)

The Habersham County Commission will hold its annual budget review meetings with department heads and constitutional officers this week. The meetings will begin Tuesday, Mar. 25 and will continue through Thursday, Mar. 27.

Department heads and constitutional officers have been working on their budgets for next year for at least two months. The county’s Finance Department distributed budget packets in February to begin the budget process.

Below is the daily schedule for the fiscal year 2026 budget review meetings for elected officials, judicial officers, constitutional officers and department heads. Each session is scheduled for approximately 15 to 20 minutes.

Tuesday March 25, 2025

9:30 AM District Attorney                           9:45 AM State Court
10:00 AM Public Defender                        10:15 AM Tax Assessors
10:30 AM Rape Response                         10:40 AM Sheriff, Heat, SRO
10:55 AM Sheriff, Jail                               11:10 AM Magistrate Court
11:20 AM Tax Commissioner                     11:30 AM Solicitor

Lunch 11:45 – 1:00 PM

1:00 PM Emergency Services                     1:15 PM Fire Department
1:30 PM Facilities Mgmt./Transit                 1:50 PM Parks & Recreation
2:10 PM Senior Center                              2:20 PM Landfill
2:30 PM Airport                                        2:50 PM Coroner
3:10 PM Information Technology

Wednesday March 26, 2025

9:30 AM Superior Court & Law Library        9:45 AM Probate Court
10:00 AM Clerk of Court                          10:20 AM Elections & Registration
10:40 AM Planning & Development           11:00 AM Extension Services
11:15 AM Juvenile Court                          11:30 AM Accountability Courts – Drug Court
11:45 AM Mental Health & Family Dependency

Lunch 12:00 – 1:00PM

1:00 PM Animal Control                            1:20 PM Emergency Mgmt. & E911
1:40 PM Fleet Services                             2:00 PM Road Department
2:20 PM County Commissioners/Clerk       2:30 PM Public Information
2:55 PM County Manager                         3:10 PM Human Resources
3:20 PM Finance & Countywide

Thursday March 27, 2025

9:30 AM Soque River Watershed               9:45 AM Health Department
10:00 AM DFACs                                    10:15 AM Development Authority
10:30 AM AVITA                                    10:45 AM Habersham Libraries
11:00 AM Legacy Link                            11:15 AM Partnership Habersham
11:30 AM Boys and Girls Club

Department heads have been instructed to be prepared to discuss their operating and capital budgets. They have also been instructed to provide any additional position requests, if needed, a department narrative, and contracted services.

After the budget review meetings, staff and commissioners will begin the tedious work of making adjustments to create the final budget that is due by June 30.

All budget review meetings will be held in the Commission Conference Room on the main floor of the Administration Building at 130 Jacob’s Way. The meetings will also be livestreamed on the county’s website at www.habershamga.com.

Our happiness requires rehab

(NowHabersham.com)

A short article titled “If you’re happy and you know it, you’re probably in Finland” caught my eye in this morning’s newspaper. According to the World Happiness Report 2025, America didn’t make it in the top 10 happiest nations, but Mexico and Costa Rica did for the first time. We didn’t even make it into the top 20, but Canada, Ireland, and the Czech Republic did.

Now, I’ll just bet you a Tickle Me Elmo doll that some of you will say, “Well, that report is some liberal mumbo jumbo,” or a few will declare, “Well, all those unhappy folks need to move to Finland!”

We are the wealthiest country in the world, yet our happiness needs to go into rehab. If my grandmother were here today, she would say, “It goes to show you money isn’t all it’s cracked up to be!”

What good is gold if our hearts are made of cold steel?

Our distrust, division, and desire for revenge are diminishing our happiness. Our need to be “right” leads us away from God’s righteousness and from caring for those who are less fortunate or different from our idealized vision of American life. Racism and antisemitism are raising their ugly heads in our backyards.

And we wonder why we aren’t happy.

The happiest people are those who give the most of what they have.  They share their time and resources without expecting anything in return.

Is it truly uplifting to foster distrust, mock others, bully, engage in name-calling, and pass judgment on people we don’t know? How does that spread joy?

We must unite to set aside what is tearing us apart and focus on caring for one another. Our biases should be discarded, as history has repeatedly shown they lead to destruction based on hatred.

Jesus never demanded we worship him; instead, he called us to follow him. He taught us to love as he loved and to live by his instructions, for it is in doing so that we find true contentment. We are encouraged to give to the poor, love the outcast, heal the sick, and free the oppressed. He gave us one commandment that can rejuvenate our happiness if we put it into practice: “Love thy neighbor.” This commandment has no exceptions.

Years ago, I won a cute little bear at the fair. I was an adult, but sometimes, things like stuffed bears and winning a prize bring me delight. I walked around the fairgrounds, hugging the pretty pink bear, when I noticed a child tugging on her mother’s hand. The girl pointed toward me, captivated by the bear. She couldn’t take her eyes off it. As she passed by, I glanced back and saw her looking at me with longing eyes, wishing for that little bear.

I turned and ran toward her, handing her my toy.  Her smile was the best prize I could ever win. That is happiness.

The happiest people are those who give the most of what they have.  They share their time and resources without expecting anything in return. They care for the lonely and comfort the sick, and their conversations focus on uplifting people, not tearing them down.

I may not be an expert on how to make our nation happier, but it starts within each of us. Each person should evaluate their own life and explore ways to elevate their spirit so that we can foster a kinder society. We need to reflect on our habits and consider making some changes.

Is it more beneficial to be blinded by grievances or open our eyes to the beauty surrounding us? Is it better to hoard our gold or use it to help those who are struggling? Is it more valuable to cling to our own happiness or spread joy to others?

Heigh-ho it’s off the rails we go: A review of Snow White

Snow White Walk of Fame (kulo/Flickr)

There is a particularly strange kind of dissonance one experiences while watching Disney’s new Snow White (2025). One moment, you’re marveling at a beautifully rendered twilight dance in a forest clearing, and the next, you’re wondering why the prince—the romantic lead, mind you—is dressed like he’s on his way to a Decemberists concert in 2008. It’s jarring, often confusing, and, in the end, narratively incoherent.

And yet, Snow White is not the worst Disney live-action remake. That dubious honor still belongs to Tim Burton’s bleak and joyless Dumbo, which managed to transform one of Disney’s simplest and most emotionally resonant classics into an elephantine slog with the color palette of a Victorian funeral. Snow White, for all its baffling choices, at least tries to be fun. Occasionally, it even succeeds. But make no mistake: this is a film whose heart may be in the right place, but its script, structure, and sense of self have wandered far, far from the path.

Let’s start with the fundamentals.

A storybook structure, torn at the seams

Snow White (2025) reimagines the classic tale with a new sense of empowerment—or, more accurately, a confused gesture in the direction of empowerment.

In the original film, Snow White enters the dwarves’ cottage, recognizes that someone lives there, and chooses to nurture the home and its inhabitants even as she heals. In this new version, she enters, falls asleep, and awakens with managerial energy, barking out orders and insisting on household chore coordination as if she were the regional director of a medieval Dollar General.

The dwarves appear to have emerged from the uncanny valley of CGI purgatory and are oddly undercut throughout the film. Gone is their familial warmth, replaced by strained comic banter and a confusing subplot in which they bully Dopey for no discernible reason rather than lovingly teasing him as in the original film. Dopey, as it turns out, becomes the emotional heart of the film, evolving from a silent family screw-up to a brave whistling wonder, and that transformation is the best character arc in the entire movie.

Meanwhile, the kingdom is suffering, the people are starving, and yet the dwarves hoard mountains of glittering treasure like morally ambiguous dragons. It’s never addressed. We’re left to assume that, despite this being a film with a strong social justice subtext, the wealth redistribution memo never made it to the forest.

Our princess

Rachel Zegler, in the titular role, is an aesthetic triumph. She has the perfect princess face, an expertly executed dress swirl, and the voice of a storybook heroine. Her solo, “Waiting on a Wish,” is the film’s musical peak, and she twirls with the kind of grace that would make even Julie Andrews pause. Her performance is strong—strong enough, in fact, to survive the off-screen drama that plagued her leading up to the movie’s release. On-screen, she is truly dreamy. Off-screen, she’s…less so. But we’re reviewing the movie, not the meme.

The real trouble lies in how her character is written. Snow White never really evolves. She begins bossy, stays bossy, and ends up inexplicably victorious despite her role as a passive observer in the very moments when she needs more than a song in her heart. She scolds, delegates, and manages her way through a revolution. The script insists she is the architect of change, but time and again, she is the one being acted upon—rescued, protected, remembered fondly—not the one making intelligent, coherent decisions. She’s a leader by sentiment, not strategy.

And then there’s her gypsy love interest.

Jonathan, perhaps the strangest romantic lead in any Disney remake to date, first appears while stealing potatoes from the castle. Snow White, demoted from princess to housemaid after the death of her parents and assumption of her evil stepmother, catches him and scolds him sternly, which is rich, considering she spends several scenes lamenting the suffering of the starving villagers. The irony is thick.

After he’s caught and captured for his theft, Snow White frees him—an act of heroism that, in any other film, would mark the beginning of a bond built on mutual trust. Instead, when they meet again in the woods, Jonathan is weirdly antagonistic. Having been saved by her, he provokes her with snide remarks, delivering a kind of performative cynicism that reminds me of an 8th-grade atheist who has just watched The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins. Still, when the Queen’s guards arrive to recapture Snow White, Jonathan and his ragtag band of unarmed, untrained misfits throw themselves between her and the danger.

It’s a bold gesture—dramatic, selfless, and clearly meant to stir something in the viewer. And yet, it lands awkwardly, like a romantic subplot that missed rehearsal. Snow White escapes, then inexplicably decides to return and fight. Jonathan, already fully redeemed in the eyes of the audience, takes an arrow for her. It’s a moment clearly designed to make us swoon, but it feels unearned—less like the climax of a slow-burn romance and more like a shortcut pasted in from another movie entirely.

Jonathan vacillates wildly throughout the movie—from a Robin Hood-esque figure with a heart for justice, to a man seemingly black-pilled on the idea of fairness, only to be reminded of truth and virtue, persuaded by the delicate curve of the princess’s cheek and the sincerity of her doe eyes. He’s less a fully realized character and more a moodboard of morally ambiguous Tumblr posts from 2011. When Snow White confronts her stepmother in the film’s climax, Jonathan is nowhere to be seen. He simply isn’t there. He’s neither captured nor injured nor acknowledged. His absence is neither strategic nor symbolic—it’s just a baffling gap. Still, he sings well.

The Queen of Camp

Enter Gal Gadot.

The marketing team would have you believe that Gal Gadot anchors this film. In truth, she is its weakest point. Her performance as the Queen is a baffling blend of soap opera vamp and suburban theatre teacher, all twirls, scowls, and half-baked malevolence.

Her song, “All is Fair,” is possibly the worst in the villain Disney canon. It’s musically incoherent, lyrically uninspired, and delivered with the vocal stylings of someone trying to imitate Idina Menzel while gargling lukewarm espresso. Meanwhile, her dancing calls to mind a middle school band director putting on a Halloween pageant—dramatic, overly enthusiastic, and entirely off-rhythmical.

But let’s give credit where it’s due. Gadot commits. She delivers every campy line like she’s auditioning for Buffy the Vampire Slayer, circa 1999, and executes a mean cape flip. It’s not good, but it’s memorable—and not entirely her fault.

The Plot. It’s gonna be a no from me, dog.

And then there’s the ending.

At some point, Snow White decides to remind us this is still a fairy tale and not a YA Novel adaptation. The Queen drinks a potion and transforms into a hag—in an underwhelming scene that, in the original film, was genuinely spooky and haunting. Here, it’s more like watching someone put on a Halloween mask in poor lighting. She sets off to destroy Snow White, who ultimately falls not in a grand battle or noble sacrifice but because of her gentle nature and persistent willingness to believe the best in people.

This would be fine if the movie didn’t market this movie as the girl-boss adaption of the original, insisting that Snow White is the architect of her own future. She isn’t. She’s a passenger. A lovely, well-dressed, melodic passenger. Again, the incoherence of this character.

The climax, such as it is, unfolds with the strategic foresight of a toddler planning an assault on the system (mom) armed with a milk bottle. Snow White rolls into the capital city with no army, no weapons, no visible allies—just good posture and a cool-ass cape. The villagers, who seem to be milling about the central square with no sense of the kingdom’s brewing civil unrest, immediately stop what they’re doing to join her in song. And that’s apparently all it takes to launch a revolution. Together, they march to the castle, where they are met not by a legion of guards or a terrifying show of force but by the Queen herself and a weirdly small band of warriors. This is a woman who has ruled through fear and is supposedly a military force, yet she shows up looking like she’s about to conduct a wine-tasting in an evil cape.

She offers Snow White the chance to kill her—an uncharacteristically casual offer—and when Snow White declines, the Queen orders her death instead. This, apparently, was always Plan B. But what was Plan A? Snow White appears to have arrived at the gates with no strategy beyond the vague hope that people will just be nice to her. When the guards prepare to obey the Queen, she launches into a soft monologue about how she remembers their names and their old jobs and how once, long ago, they were kind. This appeal to memory jolts the guards into reconsidering their life choices, and they put down their weapons.

One guardsman refuses to stab her. In a predictable fit of villainy, the Queen takes the magical knife she previously conjured out of the ether and prepares to do the deed herself—only to have an archer dramatically shoot the knife from her hand. She then flees, even though we have seen her conjure knives and shapeshift and presumably command dark forces, but now, she opts to just…run. Why she cannot summon another weapon or cast a spell is never addressed. The scene fizzles where it should have snapped.

And then the mirror—a source of the Queen’s power—is smashed. Why? We don’t know. There’s no moment of discovery, no realization that this object is key. It just…happens. It’s a magical deus ex machina. The film offers no clarity. Instead, it pivots to a fast-forwarded epilogue resembling a Joanna Gaines-themed wedding crossed with a Bridgerton Pinterest board. Everyone is happy. The dwarves are no longer rich and hoarding, we guess. The village is prosperous. The prince and Snow White kiss under pretty lights.

And we, the viewers, are left blinking at the screen, wondering whether we missed something or if the writers lost interest.

The Verdict

Snow White (2025) is not the worst live-action Disney remake. It has heart, and in flashes, it shows genuine promise. Zegler is luminous. The songs—some of them—are catchy. The dwarves are pretty charming, and Dopey’s arc is sincerely touching.

But as a whole, the movie feels like it was built from a dozen different drafts, none of which communicated with each other. It wants to be whimsical, feminist, satirical, romantic, gritty, and empowering—all at once—and ends up being none of those things in a satisfying way. It’s as though the studio tried to reimagine the tale for everyone and forgot to make it coherent for anyone.

There is joy in this film. But it’s buried beneath a pile of uneven writing, mismatched design, and confused messaging. If Dumbo was a soulless dirge, Snow White is a dazzlingly confused parade—loud, colorful, intermittently lovely, and ultimately directionless.

Carly McCurry is the publisher of The Cute North Georgian magazine. Her work appears on NowHabersham.com in partnership with Now Network News.

Only Congress can close the Department of Education, and Republicans are going to try

The Lyndon Baines Johnson Department of Education Building pictured on Nov. 25, 2024. (Shauneen Miranda/States Newsroom)

WASHINGTON (States Newsroom) — Congressional Republicans are working to codify into law President Donald Trump’s sweeping executive order that calls for the elimination of the U.S. Education Department.

GOP lawmakers, including Sens. Mike Rounds of South Dakota, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Rand Paul of Kentucky, along with Reps. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, Michael Rulli of Ohio and David Rouzer of North Carolina, are working on or have introduced legislation that would accomplish Trump’s aims in abolishing the agency.

Trump’s order recognizes that only Congress — which established the 45-year-old department — has the power to dismantle it.

But any of these lawmakers’ efforts would face major difficulties getting through the narrowly GOP-controlled Senate, which requires at least 60 senators to advance a bill past the filibuster. Republicans hold 53 seats.

Seizing on the order

Louisiana Republican Senator Bill Cassidy says he will “as soon as possible” introduce legislation related to President Donald Trump’s order calling for closing the Department of Education. (livestream image)

Following the signing on Thursday, Cassidy, who chairs the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, said on social media he will support Trump “by submitting legislation to accomplish this as soon as possible.”

The Louisiana Republican said he agrees with Trump “that the Department of Education has failed its mission.”

Rounds also plans to reintroduce a bill that seeks to abolish the department and transfer existing programs to other federal agencies.

In a post on social media Thursday, the South Dakota Republican said he’s “working on legislation that would return education decisions to states and local school districts while maintaining important programs like special education and Title I.”

“We are discussing this legislation with Secretary (Linda) McMahon and we believe there is a very good path forward,” he said.

Paul, of Kentucky, plans to reintroduce a measure this upcoming week that seeks to “terminate” the department, according to his office.

The legislation would serve as a companion to a bill that Massie, also of Kentucky, introduced in the House earlier this year.

Massie’s bill offers no details as to how the core functions of the department would be transferred to other agencies, but says the agency should “terminate” on Dec. 31, 2026.

Rulli, of Ohio, is also bringing forth legislation in the House that would help make Trump’s order a law, according to Fox News. He was one of several GOP lawmakers and state officials who attended the Thursday executive order signing ceremony in the White House.

And in January, Rouzer, of North Carolina, introduced a bill that calls for the elimination of the department and transferring certain programs to other agencies.

What the order says

Trump directed McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure” of the department and “return authority over education to the States and local communities while ensuring the effective and uninterrupted delivery of services, programs, and benefits on which Americans rely.”

The president is already taking significant steps to dismantle the agency.

Trump said Friday that the Small Business Administration would handle the student loan portfolio for the department, and that the Department of Health and Human Services would handle special education services and nutrition programs.

Prior to the executive order, the Education Department witnessed major shifts in the weeks since Trump took office.

The agency announced earlier in March that more than 1,300 employees would be cut through a “reduction in force,” or RIF, process.

Congressional Democrats push back

Meanwhile, congressional Democrats are fuming over Trump’s move to shrink the department.

Virginia U.S. Rep. Bobby Scott, ranking member of the House Committee on Education and Workforce, led his fellow Democrats on the panel in introducing a resolution of inquiry on Friday that asks Trump and McMahon to provide documents on the RIF and “other downsizing measures at the Department of Education.”

In response to Trump’s order, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said: “Enabled by compliant House Republicans, the Trump administration is determined to take a chainsaw to public education in America” in a Thursday statement.

“Shutting down the Department of Education will harm millions of children in our nation’s public schools, their families and hardworking teachers. Class sizes will soar, educators will be fired, special education programs will be cut and college will get even more expensive, at a time when the cost of living is already too high,” the New York Democrat said.

In a Thursday social media post, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said “attempting to dismantle the Department of Education is one of the most destructive and devastating steps Donald Trump has ever taken.”

Schumer said the “horrible decision by Donald Trump will be felt by teachers, parents, school leaders, and in the quality of education our children receive” and reiterated that only Congress has the authority to eliminate a department.

Habersham nearing decision on new county manager, called meeting Tuesday

(NowHabersham.com)

After two job announcements and nearly six months, the Habersham County Commission appears to be getting closer to filling the county manager’s seat vacated by Alicia Vaughn in December. Vaughn announced her resignation last September.

Commissioners have scheduled a called meeting on Tuesday, March 25, at 4 p.m. to discuss personnel. They could appoint a new county manager at that meeting.

A variety of candidates

Commissioner Bruce Harkness says around 60 people applied for the job. “They ranged everywhere from an 18-year-old fresh out of high school with no experience all the way to a retired general from the military,” he says.

The commissioners interviewed four potential candidates. The interviews were completed at a called meeting on March 5 during an extended closed session. The commission took no action at that meeting.

According to County Attorney Donnie Hunt, each candidate had a different background and experience. He added that the four candidates interviewed were all qualified for the position.

The county is not releasing the names of the finalists at this time. According to state law, the commission is required to release the names only when the number of finalists is down to three or fewer.

Decision time

Hunt says the commission has the option to interview more applicants, but several commissioners say they’re ready to fill the position.

“We were presented with four qualified individuals and I’m prepared to make a decision on who I think will serve us best,” says Mealor. “It wasn’t an easy decision because there were three in my mind of the four that were all good picks.”

“I thought we had narrowed down to a good group of candidates and I feel confident we can make the decision from one of those four,” adds Akins.

Harkness agrees that the four candidates interviewed are “very qualified.”

“Now we are trying to pick the most qualified applicant for our particular county, our staff, our taxpayers, and our wonderful community at large,” he says.

Tuesday’s meeting will be held in the Jury Assembly Room in the Habersham County Courthouse at 295 Llewellyn Street in Clarkesville.

Baldwin to consider paving projects, vac truck purchase

The Baldwin City Council will meet Monday, March 24 to consider two paving projects and the purchase of a new vac truck. (Jerry Neace/NowHabersham.com)

The Baldwin City Council will consider two paving projects and the purchase of a new vac truck during its council meeting on Monday, March 24.

One paving project will be on the Habersham County side in the Highland Pointe subdivision. The subdivision is located off of Charlie Davis Road. For paving projects for city streets on the Habersham County side, the city typically uses local maintenance and improvement grants and SPLOST to fund the projects.

The second paving project is for Banks Ridge which is located on the Banks County side of the city. For city streets on the Banks County side, the city typically funds those projects with Banks County TSPLOST.

Other business

Public Works Director Scott Barnhart will present a department update to the council about activities in the public works department.

The city will revisit the community information contract. The council approved a three year agreement with Everbridge to provide the software enabling the city to notify the community of various emergency notifications such as water outages and road closures.

However, at the last Baldwin council meeting, City Attorney Jack Samuels told the council that going with the three year contract would require some discussion with the vendor. Future councils cannot be bound to the terms of the contract unless there is language stating that the contract can be terminated. Currently, the contract only allows the city to terminate the agreement if there is a breach of contract.

The council will also consider the purchase of a new vacuum truck for the city’s public works department. The truck can be used to assist in clearing blockages in manholes in the city’s sewer system. It can also be used as a less invasive way to excavate around utilities without the need of heavy equipment.

The Baldwin City Council will meet Monday, March 24, at 6:30 p.m. The meeting will be held in the Baldwin Municipal Courtroom located at 155 Willingham Avenue in Baldwin.

Ossoff rallies Democrats with anti-Trump message as he looks to 2026 reelection bid

U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff speaks Saturday at an event called “rally for our republic.” (Jill Nolin/Georgia Recorder)

ATLANTA (Georgia Recorder) — A rowdy rally held Saturday at an Atlanta concert hall was both a response to outrage over the Trump administration’s actions during its first two months and the unofficial early kickoff of U.S. Sen. Jon Ossoff’s reelection bid.

Ossoff is seen as the most vulnerable incumbent Democratic senator going into the 2026 election, and the Georgia Senate race is expected to be one of the most competitive on the ballot next year. No Republican has launched a challenge yet, though that is largely because term-limited Gov. Brian Kemp has not announced his plans.

Saturday’s event – called “rally for our republic” – was a sign that Ossoff hopes to harness the kind of anti-Trump energy that made him a national figure during his unsuccessful 2017 congressional campaign and later helped send him to Washington with Sen. Raphael Warnock in 2020.

“Do you all remember how it felt to fight and to win?” Ossoff said Saturday. “But maybe right now you feel surrounded by darkness. You might be a little numb. You might be wondering if there’s a way out. But Atlanta, we don’t have the luxury of despair.”

Ossoff blasted the way the Trump administration and Elon Musk are going about shrinking the federal government, pointing to the backtracking that was done on cuts affecting Ebola prevention, a veterans’ crisis line and programs designed to protect the nation’s nuclear weapons.

“That’s not efficiency. That’s just cruelty and chaos,” he said.

And he painted Trump as out of touch with the economic concerns that largely propelled the former president back into the White House last year.

“They are literally the elites they pretend to hate,” Ossoff said. “The president is not at his palace in Florida thinking about whether you can afford daycare for your daughter or how to stop insurance companies from denying your claim, or anything that matters to our daily lives. When is the last time you even heard Donald Trump talk about health care or child care? He’s talking about invading Greenland.”

His fiery speech comes as polling shows the Democratic Party is deeply unpopular, with left-leaning voters saying they want Democrats to fight Trump’s agenda. Ossoff and Warnock both recently voted against the GOP’s stopgap spending bill, even as other Democrats – including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer – backed the measure.

Ossoff’s campaign spokesperson said Saturday’s event drew more than 2,000 people to the Eastern.

Ossoff was joined on stage Saturday by Warnock, who is the only Georgia Democrat who has won statewide since 2020. Warnock won a full six-year term in 2022 when he beat football legend Herschel Walker in a runoff.

The crowd was spirited and frequently shouted out things like “What’s the plan?” Warnock was peppered with so many interjections and questions that at one point the pastor joked that the attendees had “more call and response than a Black Baptist church,” saying he might take up an offering.

“We will fight the good fight, I promise you, but I don’t want you to underestimate your own power,” he said. “Because we are a government for the people, of the people, by the people and the power is really with the people.”

“I’m trying to tell you that you have more power than you think you have,” he said. “And if you make some noise in the streets, I promise you we’ll fight for you in the suites.”

Warnock urged the crowd not to give into despair.

“When we fight, we win,” Warnock said. “And if there’s any state in the union that ought to understand that, it is the great state of Georgia. I know that the times are hard, but don’t you dare forget that in 2020, when the nation needed somebody, Georgia saved the whole country.”

Many of the people who attended said they came looking for assurances that Democrats have a plan for countering the drastic – and sudden – cuts to federal government and services as well as the erosion of democratic norms.

“I just hope that we can hear some clarity from our leaders as to the direction this party is going to take us in response to Trump and Musk because right now I’m not hearing any coherent message out of the top,” said Jim Cartmill, who lives in Woodstock.

Jan Hogan, an Atlanta resident, said she attended the rally because she saw it as a way to show her deep concern.

“I’m horrified at what is happening to our country,” Hogan said. “I feel like Trump is a Russian asset and doing Putin’s bidding. Every morning you wake up and he’s done something horrible to people who are here legally.

“I’m just going WTF is happening here? I want it to stop,” Hogan said.

Pamela Reyes of Sandy Springs and Daryl Brinkley of Roswell came to the rally hoping to hear that Democrats have a plan for slowing Trump down and preserving democracy. Reyes called the current situation a “crisis.”

“The Democrats need a plan,” Brinkley said. “We’re just spinning our wheels and he’s getting away with everything he wants to do.”

Georgia legislature OKs minimum wage for those with intellectual disabilities

The Georgia legislature gave final approval to a bill that would require companies to pay Georgians with intellectual disabilities a minimum wage.

Under current state law, some Georgians with intellectual disabilities can legally be paid as little as $0.22 per hour. Senate Bill 55 would require companies to pay those affected at least $7.25 an hour, equal to the federal minimum wage.

Rep. Sharon Cooper carried the bill in the House.

“It’s about dignity and fairness and making sure that people with disabilities are paid at least what we consider the bare minimum wage for all other workers,” Cooper said.

Senate Bill 55 passed the House on March 18 with overwhelming bipartisan support. The measure passed the Senate earlier this session and now heads to Gov. Kemp’s desk to be signed into law.

This article appears on Now Habersham in partnership with GPB News

Maria Dolores Cano

Maria Dolores Cano, age 60, of Alto, Georgia, passed away on Thursday, March 20, 2025, at her residence.

Ms. Cano was born on May 25, 1964, in Mexico to the late Manuel and Elena Contreras. In addition to her parents, she was preceded in death by her brother, Luciano Contreras.

Survivors include her significant other, Juan Balderas, of Alto; son, Jesus Cano, of Cornelia; daughter, Maria Cano, of Lula; son, Rigoberto Cano, of Clarkesville; son, Guillermo Cano, of Clarkesville; daughter, Jeanette Cano, of Clarkesville; son, Juan Balderas, Jr., of Alto; sisters, Reina Tinoco, of Cornelia; Virginia Tinoco, of Alto; brothers, Francisco Contreras, of Alto; Humberto Contreras, of Clarkesville; Salvador Contreras, of Clarkesville; Rafael Contreras, of Arizona; Manuel Contreras, of Mexico; grandchildren, Elizabeth Cano, Damien Cano, Mario Cano, Joel Cano, Jazzlynn Cano, Johnny Watson, Diana Cano, Adriana Paramo, Isaiah Contreras, Kamila Contreras, Isaiah Segura, Isabella Cano, Sophyah Cano, Emilia and Oscar Cano, Jaylen Roman, and Colton Beam; great-grandchildren, Miguel and Marcell.

Funeral Services will be held at 3:00 p.m., Sunday, March 23, 2025, at Inglesias de Dios Antorcha (The Torch) in Baldwin, with Pastor Christian Roman officiating. Interment will follow in the Level Grove Cemetery.

The family will receive friends beginning at 2:00 p.m. on Saturday, March 22, 2025, at her residence, 192 Teakwood Drive, Alto, Georgia 30510.

Arrangements have been entrusted to Whitfield Funeral Homes & Crematory, North Chapel, 245 Central Avenue, Demorest, Georgia 30535. Telephone: 706-778-1700.

 


 

María Dolores Cano, de 60 años, residente de Alto, Georgia, falleció el jueves 20 de marzo de 2025 en su residencia.

La Sra. Cano nació el 25 de mayo de 1964 en México, hija de los difuntos Manuel y Elena Contreras. Además de sus padres, le precedió en la muerte su hermano, Luciano Contreras.

Le sobreviven su pareja, Juan Balderas, residente de Alto; su hijo, Jesús Cano, residente de Cornelia; su hija, María Cano, residente de Lula; su hijo, Rigoberto Cano, residente de Clarkesville; su hijo, Guillermo Cano, residente de Clarkesville; su hija, Jeanette Cano, residente de Clarkesville; su hijo, Juan Balderas, Jr., residente de Alto; sus hermanas, Reina Tinoco, residente de Cornelia; Virginia Tinoco, residente de Alto; sus hermanos, Francisco Contreras, residente de Alto; Humberto Contreras, residente de Clarkesville; Salvador Contreras, residente de Clarkesville; Rafael Contreras, residente de Arizona; Manuel Contreras, de México; nietos: Elizabeth Cano, Damien Cano, Mario Cano, Joel Cano, Jazzlynn Cano, Johnny Watson, Diana Cano, Adriana Páramo, Isaiah Contreras, Kamila Contreras, Isabella Cano, Sophyah Cano, Emilia y Oscar Cano, Jaylen Roman y Colton Beam; bisnietos: Miguel y Marcell.

El servicio fúnebre se llevará a cabo a las 15:00 h del domingo 23 de marzo de 2025 en Inglesias de Dios Antorcha en Baldwin, oficiado por el pastor Christian Roman. El entierro se realizará posteriormente en el cementerio Level Grove.

La familia recibirá a sus amigos a partir de las 14:00 h del sábado 22 de marzo de 2025 en su residencia, ubicada en 192 Teakwood Drive, Alto, Georgia 30510.

Los arreglos han sido confiados a Whitfield Funeral Homes & Crematory, North Chapel en 245 Central Avenue, Demorest, Georgia 30535. Teléfono: 706-778-1700.

North Georgia librarians fear criminal charges under proposed senate bill

Clarkesville Library Manager Shawna Meers-Ernst sorts books on shelves at the Clarkesville Library (Brian Wellmeier/Now Habersham)

Regional and local library officials across Georgia are expressing fear and uncertainty over a proposed Senate Bill that could subject librarians to criminal prosecution if a child checks out a book deemed “harmful.”

Senate Bill 74, backed by Republican lawmakers, seeks to remove existing legal protections for libraries and librarians, potentially exposing them to criminal charges for distributing materials considered harmful. The bill’s language does not clearly define “harmful,” leaving its interpretation open-ended, though the legal definition of “obscene” is well-established under the law.

Under current law, obscene material is defined as content lacking serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value while depicting sexual conduct in a patently offensive manner that appeals to a prurient interest. While SB 74 does not explicitly redefine these standards, it does strip away exemptions that have long protected public and school libraries from prosecution.

COMMENTARY Library workers deserve protection, not prosecution

Library officials across Northeast Georgia say the vague wording of the bill has created widespread unease. Delana Knight, regional director of the Northeast Georgia Library System, which oversees six libraries across Stephens, Rabun, White and Habersham counties, said library staff and patrons are particularly concerned about how the law will be interpreted.

According to Knight, there are policies on the books that have long existed which prohibited libraries from distributing obscene material to children. With more than 45,000 items within Clarkesville’s library alone, Knight said the bill could place librarians in a precarious position and possibly force them to determine what content might be deemed harmful by an undefined legal standard.

“I think we have concerns about how ‘harmful’ to minors is being interpreted,” Knight said. “As a regional library system, we already have policies in place that state we cannot distribute materials that are harmful to minors. We just want to be sure our definition and interpretation of that is the same as the bill. We also recognize the authority of parents to decide what is appropriate for their families, and of course, that is different for every family. We respect that, and we respect the parents’ decisions on what their children check out from the library.”

Shawna Meers-Ernst, manager of the Clarkesville Library, echoed these concerns and said public libraries operate under different structures than school libraries. In schools, educators act as legal guardians while students browse bookshelves. In public libraries, responsibility for a child’s reading choices typically falls on parents.

“That is based on what families think is appropriate or inappropriate in their households,” she said. “…the legal definitions of things that are obscene are definitely not things we purchase for our collections. But some things are offensive to some people, and necessary and important to other people. It would not be based on my determination, but based on what families think is appropriate.”

A key issue, Meers-Ernst added, is that what is considered “harmful” varies widely among families. She cited the “Harry Potter” series as an example – stating some parents find the books inappropriate, while others see them as valuable literature. She also expressed concern that books featuring same-sex parents or non-traditional families could be unfairly targeted under the law.

(Brian Wellmeier/Now Habersham)

“That’s not obscene,” she said. “That’s not explicit. Our collection in our library – we put in a lot of effort to make sure it reflects our community. Absolutely, we have people in our community that have two moms in their family or two dads in their family. It’s important to represent those people – because they are part of our community, and we love them. That’s part of the concern – is how far can someone take this?”

She added: “We really hope the language gets worked out in the bill a little bit better. ‘Harmful’ isn’t legally defined. Obscenity is legally defined. ‘Harmful’ is incredibly subjective. A family might think Harry Potter is harmful. We respect that. We don’t have an opinion about that. But another family won’t find it harmful. The law, absolutely, cannot be subjective. We love being here. We love our job. We want to keep doing it…situations like this cause us to be a little insecure and a little nervous about doing our job.”

Georgia Sen. Drew Echols, R-Alto, a sponsor of the bill, defended the measure which he said is aimed at stopping “bad actors” who knowingly provide explicit materials to minors. He insisted that books like “Harry Potter” would not fall under the scope of prosecution.

Echols said the bill would reaffirm existing code already on the books – specifically banning nudity, sexual conduct, sexual excitement and portrayal of sadomasochism abuse.

“You can’t legislate morality,” Echols said. “There’s no way. But we’re talking about (content) harmful to minors…we’re not pulling Harry Potter off the shelves. I just have to believe that it can’t be that hard to have a section that kids can’t get to…that’s my goal is there’s no bad actors out there.”

Echols went on to say he believes the proposed bill should more or less be enforced depending on circumstances, insinuating criminal prosecution would not apply to libraries who allow children to purchase books containing stories about same-sex couples.

“I think it’s a case-by-case situation,” Echols said. “I would love for our libraries to reflect our communities, but again, people are different.”

Georgia Sen. Bo Hatchett, R-Cornelia, also said the bill is not intended to target librarians – but individuals who aim to corrupt children by “knowingly” providing explicit content to minors. He emphasized the “good faith effort” in the law that states librarians who are unaware that children obtain age-inappropriate material will not be held responsible.

“If you knowingly provide something that is obscene to a child, you could be criminally held liable for it,” Hatchett said.

Hatchett said there was an instance in Hiawassee about two years ago when a librarian allegedly provided sexually explicit content to children, spurring action from lawmakers.

“As long as a librarian shows a good faith effort to keep (explicit material) away from children, then they will not be held liable,” he said.

As a final note, Knight said the Library System of Northeast Georgia remains committed to literacy efforts across the region despite political waves.

“We respect parents’ rights to decide what (children check out),” Knight said. “We want to be able to serve all of the members of our community and make the library a welcoming place.”

Georgia House OKs bill to prepare state code for potential end of U.S. Department of Education

Democrats say the state bill addressing the dismantling of the U.S. Department of Educaiton is premature. House Majority Leader Chuck Efstration defends it is being proactive. (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

ATLANTA (Georgia Recorder) — A bill preparing Georgia for the end of the U.S. Department of Education moved closer to Gov. Brian Kemp’s desk Friday when it passed the state House 144-15 with bipartisan support.

Senate Bill 154 amends numerous sections of state code regarding the department, adding “or its successor.”

Proponents say it would allow the state to continue work like licensing new professionals if the department is eliminated.

President Donald Trump sent his strongest signal yet that he intends to do just that Thursday, signing an executive order calling on Education Secretary Linda McMahon to “take all necessary steps to facilitate the closure” of the agency.

U.S. President Donald Trump signs an executive order to reduce the size and scope of the Education Department during a ceremony in the East Room of the White House on March 20, 2025, in Washington, D.C. (livestream image)

McMahon pledged to “follow the law and eliminate the bureaucracy responsibly by working through Congress to ensure a lawful and orderly transition,” though it is not clear whether the administration can whip enough votes to make that happen.

Department supporters say it provides vital services and enforces federal laws to ensure schools are safe, supportive and effective. Opponents say eliminating the department would save money and allow for more local control of education.

Kemp praised Trump’s order in a post on X Thursday.

“In Georgia, we’ve empowered parents, supported our teachers, and put students first. @POTUS executive order puts education back where it belongs: with the states.”

In the House, some of the praise for the state bill preparing for the potential closure was more muted.

Duluth Democratic Rep. Ruwa Romman, who voted for the bill, said she was glad to see the House and Senate come together to protect Georgians, but she said she’s not so glad that what they’re protecting Georgians from are the actions of the federal government.

“With a bill like this one, we are getting ahead on some of these issues, we are able to provide some stability to parents, but the reality is they shouldn’t need it to begin with,” she said. “And that’s what really gets me is that we are now having to deal with issues and work on issues that we shouldn’t have to, even in the limited time that we already have, so now instead of dealing with the already growing backlog of problems that Georgians have, we are now seeing an even bigger backlog because of the chaos on the federal level.”

Rep. Ruwa Romman watches a close vote in the House. (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

House Majority Leader Chuck Efstration, a Mulberry Republican, disagreed with Democrats’ characterization that the federal government’s actions were improper or chaotic.

“That is not unilateral action,” he said. “There’s acknowledgement that Congress will have to act on that. But if Congress does act before we are back in session in January 2026, we will have taken necessary steps to make sure that our code is updated, and I believe that this is an opportunity for us to reflect our priority and focus on the education of Georgia students and to embrace this not with uncertainty, but with confidence. This is going to allow an opportunity to continue to prioritize students, educators and professionals in Georgia classrooms. It’s going to give an opportunity to ensure that every license, every training program and institution in this state that provides education is able to function smoothly and effectively.”

Because the bill was amended in a House committee, it must head back to the Senate for another vote before it can reach Kemp’s desk. The end of this year’s legislative session is set for April 4.