Home Blog Page 510

Facebook, Instagram back up after widespread outage

If you were kicked out of your Facebook or Instagram account while scrolling earlier Tuesday, you weren’t alone.

Meta’s social media platforms had problems Tuesday morning, with Instagram, Facebook, Facebook Messenger, and Threads pulling up “failure to load” error pages.

DownDetector reported over 461,000 outages at 10:37 a.m. at the outage’s peak. Instagram also had over 70,000 reported outages at the peak.

Apps were also affected, which refused to reload or kicked out users entirely.

“Earlier today, a technical issue caused people to have difficulty accessing some of our services,” said Andy Stone, a communications representative for Meta. “We resolved the issue as quickly as possible for everyone who was impacted, and we apologize for any inconvenience.”

All platforms appear to be fully functional now, although some users say they are having issues with logging back in due to the two-factor login protocol.

Candidates begin qualifying at Georgia Capitol

Georgia Democratic Congressmen Hank Johnson and Sanford Bishop fill out qualifying paperwork, while candidates including Congresswomen Lucy McBath and Nikema Williams wait in line behind them. (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

ATLANTA (Georgia Recorder) — The Georgia Capitol was abuzz Monday with lawmakers and hopeful lawmakers lined up to qualify to run for office.

All of Georgia’s 14 Congressional representatives, 56 state senators, and 180 state representatives will be up for election. A lot of them – and a lot of people who want to replace them – showed up at the Capitol Monday for the first of five days of signups.

An open seat

One person who won’t be dropping by is Republican Congressman Drew Ferguson, who announced he would not be running late last year, opening up a seat in the deeply conservative 3rd District.

Former state Rep. Philip Singleton (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

Three Republican former state lawmakers signed up to try their hands in Congress Monday. Former state Rep. Philip Singleton and former state Sens. Mike Dugan and Mike Crane will be on the Republican ballot next to retired police officer Jim Bennett.

Singleton said he’s expecting seven Republican candidates to qualify, but he thinks he’s the best man for the job.

“They’re doing a lot on the campaign trail now, and unfortunately, I’m the only one that’s ever done it in the legislature,” he said. “So to me it’s about telling the truth to the voters, and then when you get into office and you get elected, you actually have to do the things you said you were going to do. That’s more than a token vote on the topic once every legislative cycle and try to cover your bases.”

Dugan said he thinks voters will find his record superior.

“In the four years that I was majority leader, you look at issues that the state had been talking about for decades that we needed done and never got them done, during those four years, we got them done,” he said. “Whether it be in the military, whether it be in business, whether it be legislative, I’m the only person in this race that has a proven record of actually accomplishing things.”

Former state Sen. Mike Dugan (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

Two Democrats have qualified for District 3, retired physician Val Almonord and nuclear medicine technologist Maura Keller.

A periwinkle state?

All five of Georgia’s Democratic congressional incumbents qualified Monday morning.

The Democratic Party has been gaining in Georgia in recent elections, and Congresswoman Nikema Williams, chair of the Democratic Party of Georgia, was chipper about her party’s prospects.

“People are lined up this morning waiting to get in to qualify,” she said. “We’re gonna have a very diverse slate of candidates up and down the ticket, some new state legislative lines, we are gonna be competitive in places where we have not been competitive before, a few more fair districts on the ballot, so I am looking forward to Georgia Democrats performing in every corner of every county.”

If Georgians are excited about the Democrats in the corners of their counties, they are less jazzed up about the Democrat in the figurative corners of the Oval Office.

Congresswoman Nikema Williams (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

A recent Bloomberg News/Morning Consult poll found that if the election were held last month, 45% of the respondents said they would have given their vote to presumptive Republican nominee former President Donald Trump while 38% would go for President Joe Biden.

As he shook hands with and chatted with newly official GOP candidates, Georgia Republican Party Chair Josh McKoon predicted Biden’s weakness would help Republicans chalk up wins this November.

“Like in many other states, immigration and the economy are the top two issues,” he said. “(Trump) has been talking about immigration for eight years. He’s got a huge advantage over President Biden on that issue. He’s got an advantage over President Biden on the economy. People vote their pocketbooks. They vote national security, and I think that means they’re going to be voting Republican in November for President Trump and the rest of our ticket.”

Biden is not Mr. Popular in the state, but Trump is also disliked by many Georgians. The same Morning Consult poll found Trump’s somewhat unfavorable and very unfavorable ratings were 12% and 40% respectively, while 30% had a very favorable opinion and 16% said had a somewhat favorable opinion.

Rep. Rich McCormick speaks with Georgia Republican Party Chair John McKoon after qualifying to run for re-election (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

Biden scored a very unfavorable rating from 45% of respondents, with another 13% holding a somewhat unfavorable opinion. The president was seen as very favorable by 21% and somewhat favorable by 18%.

Williams said she was “excited” to have Biden at the top of the ballot and touted some of his accomplishments, including the Bipartisan Infrastructure Act. She said Democrats will be working between now and November to remind Georgians about those accomplishments.

“Elections are hard. We’re a true battleground state now,” she said. “We’re not blue, we’re not red, we’re periwinkle. But we’ve got work to do. We have to continue to get our message out to the voters and make sure that they understand who has delivered for them. Democrats deliver day in and day out.”

District shuffle

One Democrat, Congresswoman Lucy McBath, is hoping to deliver to another district yet again.

McBath, now of the 7th District, is running in the 6th District after a federal judge approved a redistricting plan that made her seat friendlier to Republicans.

McBath said she is used to this sort of thing. She flipped the 6th District in 2018, but 2021’s redistricting plan drew the 6th as more conservative, so McBath challenged and defeated fellow Democrat Carolyn Bourdeaux for her seat in the 7th.

Congresswoman Lucy McBath speaks with reporters after qualifying to run for re-election. (Ross Williams/Georgia Recorder)

“We keep having these discussions over and over again, but I’m happy to represent any constituent,” she said. “I’m happy to continue to do the work, and I have decided, as I have in every election, I will not let the extreme Republicans determine when my work in Congress has done. I will let the people decide.”

McBath has so far drawn one challenger from each party. Republican roadside service provider Jeff Criswell threw in his hat Monday, and so did Democratic state Rep. Mandisha Thomas of South Fulton.

The district shuffle means Republican Congressman Rich McCormick will be sliding from the 6th District to the 7th, where he qualified Monday.

Gainesville wants your input on downtown’s future

Public input is being sought on the future of Gainesville's historic downtown square. (photo courtesy Gainesville Convention and Visitors Bureau)

The city of Gainesville is hoping to get residents’ insight on what they would like to see in downtown Gainesville. The city plans to use the feedback to help shape future development.

The city is hosting two public meetings on March 14 to get feedback on the future of the downtown area. The first meeting will be from 2-4 p.m. at The Vault at The National, located at 109 Green St. The second meeting will be from 5-7 p.m.

Downtown Gainesville has grown rapidly in recent years, and the city is hoping to hear from residents what they want in their town square. City planners say they’re open to all ideas and also want input on what aspects of the historic square could be improved.

Some of the questions residents will be asked include: where people linger, where they sit and stay, how people flow around the square and what park elements they most want to see.

The city will also be asking residents to draw what they envision the downtown square will look like in 10 years.

Residents will have the chance to complete a short survey about themselves and their businesses.

City staff will be on hand for discussion and to answer questions.

The Vault at the National is located at 109 Green Street in downtown Gainesville, Georgia.

Elbert wins pitcher’s dual at TFS in top-10 ranked showdown

A top-10-ranked matchup featuring #4-ranked Tallulah Falls and #5-ranked Elbert County ended in a 1-0 win for the Blue Devils on Monday evening.

Both sides were held to a grand total of six hits. Danny Grant, Chase Pollock, and Diego Gonzalez recorded singles, but TFS couldn’t scratch across a run. Pollock (1-1) was fantastic on the mound, going 5.2 innings while giving up the one earned run on just two hits and four walks against eight strikeouts. He takes the tough-luck loss. Cole Bonitatibus went 1.1 innings in relief with a hit and three strikeouts.

The Indians are now 5-3 overall and 0-1 in region play.

L: Chase Pollock (1-1)

Lady Indians shut out Mt. Paran, Indians nearly pull out win

Ava Carnes (Austin Poffenberger)

Playing for the first time since February 15, TFS tennis hosted Mt. Paran and earned another split. The Lady Indians won 5-0, while the Indians narrowly beat the defending state champs in a 3-2 loss.

“Great effort by the girls to get another win,” says coach Anthony Cox. “Boys were super close against a defending state champion, so this is something we can build on. Great win for Fabian and David at 2-doubles.”

Ariel Kelsick’s win at 1-singles gives her 22 singles wins for her career, surpassing Evette Corwin (’22) for the program record. The Lady Indians improve to 7-0, while the Indians are now 1-6.

Lady Indians W 5-0 vs Mt. Paran

#1 Singles: Ariel Kelsick (7-0) W 6-1, 6-1
#2 Singles: Jaeda-Lee Daniel-Joseph (5-2) W 6-1, 6-0
#3 Singles: Azaria Junaid (7-0) W 6-0, 6-0
#1 Doubles: Ava Carnes & Keira Webb (1-0) W 6-2, 6-4
#2 Doubles: Lizzie Huebner & Landry Carnes (3-0) W 6-1, 6-1

Indians L 2-3 vs Mt. Paran

#1 Singles: Tanner Davis (4-3) W 6-4, 6-0
#2 Singles: TJ Cox (2-5) L 5-7, 2-6
#3 Singles: Zach Carringer (1-4) L 1-6, 1-6
#1 Doubles: Jake Owensby & Glad Puscasu (1-4) L 0-6, 1-6
#2 Doubles: Fabian Deppe & David Vasic (1-4) W 6-1, 3-6 (10-8)

GBI: Demorest man shoots self after pursuit through Clarkesville

A GBI agent photographs the scene where investigators say William Lamberti of Demorest took his own life following a police chase in Clarkesville. The GBI says the Demorest man died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound. (GBI photo)

Authorities late Monday afternoon released information about a deadly incident that occurred Sunday night west of Clarkesville.

According to a press release from the Georgia Bureau of Investigation, at around 10 p.m. on March 3, Clarkesville police initiated a traffic stop on a truck driven by William Charles Lamberti, 48, of Demorest. Lamberti refused to stop and led police on a chase, the GBI says.

The Habersham County Sheriff’s Office and Demorest Police Department assisted in the pursuit. The pursuit traveled to Highway 115 near Habersham Mills Road, where a sheriff’s deputy performed a PIT maneuver on Lamberti’s truck, ending the chase.

A Clarkesville police officer was unable to stop his patrol vehicle in time and ran into the wrecked Toyota Tacoma pickup truck Lamberti was driving, the Georgia State Patrol says.

According to the GBI, after the pursuit ended, Lamberti shot himself inside the truck. Habersham EMS treated Lamberti at the scene and took him to an area hospital, where he was pronounced dead.

(GBI photo)

The GBI says there was a passenger in the vehicle with Lamberti. Authorities did not release the passenger’s name and did not say whether they were injured. The GBI also did not release details on what prompted the pursuit.

Troopers with Georgia State Patrol Post 7 in Toccoa investigated the three-vehicle accident that resulted from the PIT maneuver.

According to Habersham County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Rob Moore, the agencies involved in the pursuit asked for the Georgia Bureau of Investigation to process the scene.

Highway 115 at Habersham Mills Road was closed for over six hours as crews collected evidence. The road reopened after 5 a.m. Monday, March 4.

The GBI says Lamberti’s body will be taken to the State Medical Examiner’s Office in Decatur for an autopsy.

 

ACC commissioners expected to vote on Salvation Army grant

While most eyes at Tuesday’s Mayor and Commission meeting will likely be turned to a $500,000-plus package of public safety enhancements and possible protests over Athens-Clarke County’s policies towards undocumented migrants, commissioners are also expected to vote on whether to allocate $550,000 to the Salvation Army to expand its capacity to accept unhoused people in its shelter.

The measure, part of a larger package of spending to beef up the county’s response to a growing homelessness problem, sparked debate at a meeting in January. Commissioner Jesse Houle questioned the process, which skipped the usual request for proposals that the county government follows.

“We’re rushing in this case, skipping the bidding process that would normally happen and just direct awarding $550,000 to the Salvation Army for a proposal that’s fairly underdeveloped,” Houle said.

Other homelessness service providers also criticized the process. In a letter to commissioners, leaders from Project Safe, Family Promise, Bigger Vision, and the Athens Area Homeless Shelter called it “confounding” that they were shut out of the process afforded to the Salvation Army and asked ACC officials to allocate funding to all shelter programs in the county.

While commissioners approved the measure at that January meeting, it has taken since then for a contract to be drafted and for county staff to work with the Salvation Army to provide more detail about the scope of services and how the money would be spent. That contract is what commissioners are expected to vote on Tuesday night.

According to the Salvation Army in documents prepared by county staff, the $550,000 allocation would provide ten additional beds in the Salvation Army’s shelter, as well as an additional 20 cots for temporary overflows caused by severe weather. A portion of the money would also go towards other upgrades, including new security cameras, new bunk beds and locker space, and pay raises for monitors and case workers, who currently make $9-$17 per hour.

At the January meeting, some commissioners also voiced concerns about the role of District 7 Commissioner John Culpepper, who serves on the Salvation Army’s board and played a role in drafting the measure. Culpepper recused himself from January’s vote.

This article comes to Now Habersham in partnership with WUGA

Five months late, Congress is poised to pass a huge chunk of federal spending

WASHINGTON (States Newsroom) — Congress is on track to approve a staggering $468 billion in government spending this week, finishing part of the work it was supposed to complete by Oct. 1 — including a big boost intended to shore up the federal WIC nutrition program for women, infants and children.

Other agencies will see cuts, including the FBI and the National Park Service, as Democrats and Republicans haggled over winners and losers in the annual spending process. There are spending increases for items such as wildland fire management, first-time-ever federal oversight of cosmetics and emergency rental assistance for low-income families.

Surviving: Plenty of earmarks for lawmakers’ local projects, also referred to as congressionally directed spending or community project funding, which received $12.655 billion in spending for the 6,630 projects within the six spending bills combined into one package, according to two people familiar with the total.

For example, the bill that provides funds for the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration includes everything from $3 million for the Integrative Precision Agriculture Laboratory at the University of Georgia Research Foundation Inc. to $800,000 for Livingston Parish Courthouse Renovations in Louisiana to $3.3 million for the Pinetop Wildland Fire Response Station in Arizona.

The U.S. House and Senate are expected to take broadly bipartisan votes to send the package known as a “minibus” to President Joe Biden ahead of a Friday midnight deadline.

However, agreement on six other consequential appropriations bills, which are due by March 22 and include health, defense and homeland security programs, remains elusive.

Dems tout WIC funding

The first batch of government funding bills brokered by the divided Congress includes the Agriculture-FDA, Commerce-Justice-Science, Energy-Water, Interior-Environment, Military Construction-VA and Transportation-HUD measures.

Senate Appropriations Chair Patty Murray, a Washington state Democrat, said in a statement released Sunday that she and other Democratic lawmakers “fought hard to protect investments that matter to working people everywhere and help keep our economy strong—rejecting devastating cuts to housing, nutrition assistance, and more.”

“Forcing states to pick and choose which moms and kids will be able to access essential WIC benefits was never an acceptable outcome to Democrats, and this bill ensures that won’t happen by fully funding WIC for millions of families nationwide,” Murray said, referring to the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children, known as WIC, which provides grants to states and had faced a shortfall.

Maine Republican Sen. Susan Collins, ranking member on the panel, said in a written statement the “bills will make a real difference in communities throughout the United States.”

“Members of the Appropriations Committee in both chambers have worked very hard to reach agreements on the bill text unveiled today,” Collins said. “I look forward to working with Chair Murray and our colleagues to bring this legislation to the Senate floor for a vote without any further delay.”

House Appropriations Committee Chair Kay Granger, a Texas Republican, said the bills “achieve what we set out to do: strategically increase defense spending and make targeted cuts to wasteful non-defense programs.”

Connecticut Democratic Rep. Rosa DeLauro, ranking member on the House Appropriations Committee, said in a statement the bipartisan bills “help keep communities safe and healthy.”

“I am grateful that each of these bills rejects many of the extreme cuts and policies proposed by House Republicans and protects the great strides we made over the last two years to reverse the underinvestment in domestic programs that Americans depend on,” DeLauro said. “I urge swift passage of this package and look forward to releasing the remaining 2024 funding bills.”

Agency cuts

The bills would cut funding from several federal agencies, including a $977 million reduction to the Environmental Protection Agency, a $654 million cut for the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a $150 million reduction to the National Park Service, and a $122 million cut to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms.

The Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Veterans Affairs and military construction projects are among the programs that would see an increase in their funding.

Congress, after approving these six bills this week, must finalize a bipartisan agreement on the remaining six.

Those bills include Defense, Financial Services and General Government, Homeland Security, Labor-HHS-Education, Legislative Branch and State-Foreign Operations. They are typically harder to negotiate than the bills in this week’s minibus.

Congress would likely start on the fiscal 2025 process shortly after approving all dozen annual appropriations bills, given that Biden is expected to send lawmakers his next request for fiscal 2025 on March 11.

Here’s a breakdown of what’s funded in each of the bills that Congress will vote on this week.

Agriculture-FDA

The Agriculture-FDA funding bill would provide $26.2 billion in discretionary spending for the agencies and programs within the legislation, including conservation and rural development. That represents a $383 million increase above current funding levels.

The USDA would receive $22.3 billion, which would be about $383 million more than current law. That discretionary funding would go toward several programs, including the Agricultural Research Service, the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service and the Foreign Agricultural Service.

The FDA would receive $3.5 billion in discretionary funding, including “$7 million to conduct oversight of cosmetics for the first time ever and $1.5 million to reduce animal testing through alternative methods,” according to a summary of the bill released by Senate Democrats.

The Agriculture-FDA measure includes significant mandatory spending as well, which is counted outside the discretionary spending caps the Biden administration and House Speaker Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, agreed to in January.

Mandatory spending is required by laws that Congress has already approved. It makes up the largest component of federal expenditures and is often spent outside of the annual appropriations process, though some mandatory spending accounts are reported in the bills.

Discretionary accounts make up about one-third of federal spending and are what’s subject to the spending caps on the dozen annual appropriations bills.

The Agriculture-FDA bill would approve $7 billion for the Women, Infants and Children program, an increase of more than $1 billion compared to its current funding level.

The increase would “fully fund” the WIC program, which includes more than 7 million people, according to subcommittee Chairman Martin Heinrich, a New Mexico Democrat, who said in a statement he was “focused on delivering for American families, farmers and producers, and rural communities.”

“This bill gets that done, even while we had to make some tough decisions to get there,” Heinrich said. “I am especially proud that we stood firm to fully fund WIC and the other programs that will help put food on the table for America’s kids.”

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or SNAP, which provides grocery benefits to low-income families, would get $122.4 billion, a $32 billion decrease in mandatory spending that’s “due to the end of pandemic-era benefits and decreases in participation rates,” according to a summary of the bill from Senate Republicans.

Child nutrition programs — like the national school lunch program, school breakfast program and summer food programs — would get $33.3 billion, an increase of $4.7 billion over what the federal government currently spends.

The legislation doesn’t include many of the conservative policy riders House Republicans added in their original bill, such as a proposal to ban the abortion medication mifepristone from being sent to patients through the mail.

The bill has 72-pages of community projects, formerly known as earmarks, that will go to nearly every state in the country.

Commerce-Justice-Science

The Commerce-Justice-Science spending bill provides approximately $67 billion in discretionary funding plus $2 billion in emergency funding “to address violent crime, counter the fentanyl crisis, and maintain U.S. scientific, technological, and economic superiority over China,” according to Senate Republicans’ summary of the bill.

That funding level would be divvied up with about $37.5 billion for the Department of Justice, $10.8 billion for the Department of Commerce, $9.1 billion for the National Science Foundation and nearly $24.9 billion for the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, or NASA.

The bill would approve $844 million for the Executive Office for Immigration Review, or EOIR, that will go toward legal services for underrepresented communities and modifications to courtrooms. That is about $16 million less than current law.

The bill would address the more than 2.5 million case backlog in immigration courts by hiring new immigration judges and providing training.

The bill would require EOIR to implement a performance appraisal based on recommendations from the Government Accountability Office for immigration judges and the agency has to submit a report to Congress on the results of the appraisal process.

The legislation provides an increase of $13 million for the Violence Against Women Act, bringing the funding level to  $713 million toward those programs. That funding will go toward assistance with transitional housing, domestic violence reduction, sexual assault services, research on violence against Indigenous women and legal assistance, among other initiatives.

The bill provides about $10.6 billion for the FBI, a decrease from fiscal 2023. That funding will go toward targeting fentanyl and opioid trafficking, child exploitation, trafficking and bioforensic analysis, among other initiatives.

The bill includes a 95% cut in funding for FBI construction, from $629.1 million to $30 million. The bill would require the FBI to conduct a study on the “feasibility of expanding the FBI operations in regional offices around the country,” according to the explanatory statement. 

The bill includes a provision that none of the funds can be used to “target or investigate parents who peacefully protest at school board meetings and are not suspected of engaging in unlawful activity.”

House Republicans have scrutinized the Justice Department after the agency directed the FBI to investigate threats of violence made to school board officials and teachers after a conservative backlash to discussions about race in public schools.

The bill would provide the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives with $1.6 billion, a decrease of $112 million below fiscal year 2023 levels in order to reverse “anti-Second Amendment overreach,” according to a summary of the bill by House Republicans.  

Members of Congress obtained 86 pages of earmarks in the Commerce-Justice-Science bill.

Energy-Water

The Energy-Water appropriations measure would moderately boost spending on defense — primarily the Energy Department’s nuclear programs — while cutting slightly from the bill’s domestic water infrastructure accounts.

The defense discretionary total in that bill, which is apart from overall Pentagon spending, would be $33.3 billion, a 6% increase from fiscal 2023, and discretionary domestic spending on the bill’s programs would be $24.9 billion, a 2% decrease.

The bill includes more than $50 billion for the Department of Energy, $8.7 billion for the Army Corp of Engineers, which oversees most federal water project construction, and $1.9 billion for the Interior Department’s Bureau of Reclamation.

The National Nuclear Security Administration would see a nearly $2 billion funding increase from fiscal 2023, almost all of which is for the agency’s weapons activities.

The Bureau of Reclamation, the Interior Department agency that deals with water and hydroelectric power, would see a $31 million decrease to $1.9 billion.

The bill included 30 pages of earmarks.

Interior-Environment

The Interior-Environment funding bill, which covers the Interior Department, EPA and related agencies, totals $41.2 billion, which would be a decrease of more than $11 billion, more than 21%, from fiscal 2023.

The bill would cut nearly $1 billion of the EPA’s budget, a 9.6% decrease from fiscal 2023.

Most of that cut, $745 million, is from the agency’s Hazardous Substance Superfund. That account, which funds cleanup of massive environmental hazardous waste sites, would receive $537.7 million, down from $1.3 billion in fiscal 2023.

Two other long-term spending laws, the 2021 bipartisan infrastructure law and Democrats’ 2022 energy, taxes and domestic policy law, provide additional funding for Superfund cleanup. Total federal spending would be more than $3 billion in fiscal 2024, even with the proposed cut.

Addressing wildfires was a priority in the bill, according to summaries from both Senate Democrats and House Republicans.

The bill includes $6 billion for the U.S. Forest Service, including $2.3 billion for the agency’s Wildland Fire Management program. That represents an increase of $1.37 billion for wildland fire management.

The bill would also maintain full funding for wildland firefighter pay, which was increased in the 2021 infrastructure law.

The bill maintains $900 million in mandatory federal spending for the Land and Water Conservation Fund that allocates money for federal land acquisition, state grants for outdoor recreation and related efforts.

And it would direct $1.9 billion in mandatory spending for the National Parks and Public Land Legacy Restoration Fund that addresses roads and buildings across five Interior Department agencies, with the bulk of the funding going to the National Park Service.

The funding levels in both the Land and Water Conservation Fund and public lands fund meet caps established in the 2020 Great American Outdoors Act and do not count against the discretionary funding limit.

The bill includes 100 pages of earmarks.

Military Construction-Veterans Affairs

Lawmakers are touting the Military Construction and VA bill’s $326.4 billion total as “fully funding” veterans’ benefits and health care, bolstering national security in the Indo-Pacific region, and upgrading housing for service members and their families, among other priorities, according to a statement Sunday from Murray’s office.

The bill contains $175.2 billion in mandatory spending on veterans’ benefits that encompass disability compensation, education, and employment training.

On the discretionary side, $153.92 billion would be allocated to the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs as well as four related agencies, including Arlington National Cemetery, American Battle Monuments Commission, Armed Forces Retirement Home, and the Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims.

If cleared by Congress, the lion’s share of the bill’s funds, at $134.8 billion, would go to the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Of that total, roughly $121 billion would be allocated for veterans medical care, including $16.2 billion for mental health, $5.2 billion for telehealth services, $3.1 billion for homelessness programs, $231 million for substance abuse and opioid misuse prevention, and $108 million for overall well-being programs, or “Whole Health Initiatives.”

The remaining $18.675 billion in discretionary funds would head to the Department of Defense for the planning and construction of several military projects, including $2.4 billion for shipyard infrastructure, $2 billion for military family housing, and $1.5 billion for construction or upgrades to military Reserve and Guard facilities.

Specific domestic projects and their locations can be found in the 11 pages of lawmaker earmarks for community funding. They include a range of infrastructure upgrades, numerous child development centers and several barracks upgrades at military sites across the U.S.

Other allocations in the military construction spending total include $634 million for energy projects, $293 million to the NATO Security Investment Program, and $489 million for base realignment and closures, $50 million of which will be dedicated to the cleanup of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, otherwise known as PFAS chemicals.

About $131 million would be allocated for planning, design and minor construction for the U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, which operates in a strategically important region for the U.S. military.

The Military Construction and VA spending bill also sets some funding levels for the following fiscal year. The bill allocates $195.8 billion for veterans’ benefits and $112.6 billion in discretionary programs in 2025.

Transportation-HUD

The Transportation-HUD appropriations measure would appropriate about $89.5 billion in discretionary funding for the dozens of programs throughout the bill.

Another $8 billion in emergency funding was added to the legislation “to maintain current rental assistance for low income Americans amid a collapse in housing receipts that are used to help offset the cost of such assistance,” according to a summary of the bill from Senate Republicans.

The Department of Transportation would receive $27 billion in discretionary funding while another $79 billion would come from obligation limitations, according to Senate Democrats’ summary of the bill.

The Federal Aviation Administration would receive $20.1 billion, about $1 billion more than its current funding level. The money would allow the FAA to hire “1,800 new controllers, improving training facilities at the air traffic controller academy, and addressing the reliability of critical IT and telecommunications legacy systems,” according to Senate Democrats’ summary.

The Federal Highway Administration would receive $63 billion, the Federal Railroad Administration would get $2.9 billion and the Federal Transit Administration would receive $16 billion.

“To address the rail safety deficiencies identified in the East Palestine, Ohio, train derailment, the bill provides a $27.3 million increase for FRA’s safety and operations budget—meeting the President’s budget request for rail safety inspectors,” according to Senate Democrats’ summary.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development would receive $70.1 billion that would go toward “rental assistance and self-sufficiency support for low-income working families, seniors, veterans, and persons with disabilities; housing and services to homeless individuals; and support for economic and community development,” according to the Senate Republican summary.

Homeless Assistance Grants would increase in funding by $418 million to $4.05 billion. Community Development Block Grants would receive $3.3 billion in funding.

The Native American Housing Block Grant program would receive $1.3 billion, a “historic level of funding” that would “make significant progress in addressing the dire housing needs of Indian Country, where residents are nearly twice as likely to live in poverty and nearly three times more likely to live in overcrowded conditions compared to other U.S. households,” according to Senate Democrats’ summary.

The Transportation-HUD bill includes 306 pages of community projects, or earmarks, making it one of the more significant bills for lawmakers to receive funding for priority initiatives.

Those include $1 million for the William Way LGBT Community Center in Philadelphia, one of three projects that House Republicans stripped out of their original bill in July after initially approving them.

The bill didn’t include funding for the LGBT Center of Greater Reading in Pennsylvania, which was originally selected for $970,000 in funding, or for affordable senior housing at LGBTQ Senior Housing, Inc. in Massachusetts, which was on track for $850,000 in funding.

Demorest wall project delayed due to defective sealant

The sidewalk above the new retaining wall in Demorest is waiting for new sealant to be applied. (Jerry Neace/NowHabersham.com)

A project that was supposed to be completed by the end of last year has hit another hurdle.

According to Demorest City Manager Mark Musselwhite, the contractor had to remove the sealant from the sidewalk and the joints above the recently installed retaining wall on Central Avenue/Historic US 441 due to the sealant being defective. It only affects the middle section that is covered in plastic. The plastic is in place to prevent water intrusion under the sidewalk and eroding beneath the wall.

Musselwhite states that according to the contractor, the sealant they used in that section of sidewalk was a “bad batch” and had to be removed and replaced.

He adds that they did not have to remove the sidewalk, only the defective sealant. Once the new sealant is applied, they will continue with installing the handrails.

SEE RELATED: Demorest wall project nears completion, finally

Georgia DOT awarded the project to Vertical Earth nearly a year ago. Vertical Earth had hoped to complete the project last summer once the hand railing arrived, however, the hand railing didn’t arrive until early winter.

The project had a completion date of December 31, 2023 but missed that deadline due to supply chain issues with receiving the required railing.

Musselwhite did not have a completion date for the project.

W. L. (Dub) Lovell, Sr.

On Sunday morning, March 3, 2026, just before sunrise, W. L. (Dub) Lovell, Sr., after a difficult period of illness accepted his invitation to cast off the pain of this world and rise with the morning sun to enter a well-deserved and glorious eternal rest.

Dub entered this life on October 22, 1924. The fifth child of the ten children born to Virgil and Lillie Lovell. He grew up on a large farm where he worked hard alongside his siblings and parents farming the land, and caring for a wide variety of farm animals including the Black Angus cattle that his father helped introduce to this area. Dub attended the Providence School and is a member of Providence Baptist Church.

As a young man he served in the military during the Korean Conflict between January 11, 1945 and November 24, 1946, he served as a Military Policeman. He received the Asiatic Pacific Campaign Ribbon, Army of Occupation (Japan), Ribbon Victory Ribbon 2 Overseas Service Bars, and Expert Infantryman Badge.

Dub worked for the Georgia Department of Natural Resources for 28 years as a Game Ranger, attaining the rank of lieutenant and later managing the Fish Hatchery at Moccasin Creek in Rabun County, Georgia. Unrealized by many, during these years, Dub was very actively and powerfully successful in advocating to the members of the Georgia Legislature and other influential individuals at the Georgia Capital in Atlanta and around the state for their support of many policies and issues that would aid the Georgia Department of Natural Resources with its mission to manage the rich natural resource of Georgia. He knew and entertained in his home and on his farm every Georgia governor from Herman Talmadge through Sonny Perdue. Dub was known for his wonderful fresh-caught fish fries and has fed many friends and visitors at his home. His ability to move through such a varied group of personalities is due to the fact that Dub treated each person he met the same as an equal and received the same respect back from them. You always knew where you stood with him. He was always willing to help a friend if it was within his power to do so.

Except for a few years at the beginning of his career when he was stationed in such locations as Social Circle and Conasauga, Georgia, he lived his life in or no more than a few miles from Batesville with his family. Continuing to support the DNR as well as his community. An example, he was the driving force instrumental in securing the placement of a volunteer fire department in the Batesville community. Dub watched over his family, and lived a long, fulfilling, eventful and influential life and will be remembered and greatly missed by the many people whose lives he touched and all his friends and family who loved him.

Dub is preceded in death by his parents, Virgil and Lille K. Lovell, and his siblings and their spouses: V. L. Lovell and Blondine Lovell, Lillie Marie Lovell Barron and Sion Barron, Irene Lovell Blalock, and Woodrow Blalock, R. L. Lovell and Murvine Lovell, Carlos Lovell and Ruby Lovell, V. C. Lovell and JoAnne Lovell, Earl Lovell and Janice Lovell. Also preceding Dub in death are wife Thelma Garrish Lovell, and wife Irene Allen Lovell, and daughter Patsy Lovell Christopher.

Dub is survived by siblings and their spouses: Fred Lovell and Yvonne Welborn Lovell, and Judy Lovell Rea. Children and spouses: Ann Lovell Vandiver Braudy and Douglas Braudy, Peggy Lovell Cantrell Huffman and Stewart R. Huffman, W. L. (Buddy) Lovell, Jr. Grandchildren and spouses: Scott Cantrell and Hortencia (Abi), Ang’ele Cantrell and Michael McLaine, Travis Morgan Lovell, Jamieson Paul Lovell, Tyler Cody Barnes and Jordan Barnes, Adam Lovell, Katie Irene Christopher Shockley and Matt Shockley, Matthew Christopher. Chelsea Lindsey, Carleen Monti, Kirsten Lindsey. Daughter-in-law: Judith C. Lovell. Great Grandchildren: Patsy Folds, Zack Lovell, Alexandria (Andi) Lovell, Waylon Barnes, Katherine Shockley, Kaitlyn Shockley, Kylie Annette ‘Pumpkin’ Miller, Charlotte Tyre, Evelyn Watts, Bo Monti, Brantley Keller, Drake Keller, Oaklee Dawson.

We appreciate the support provided by the caring Hospice nurses and aids who have been there for us. The entire Lovell family are so grateful for the loving care that our amazing caregiver Amber Cook Gragg has given Daddy during the past two years.

Funeral services will be held at 2:00 PM on Thursday, March 7, 2024, at Hillside Memorial Chapel, with Rev. Eddie Tanner officiating. Interment will follow the service in Providence Baptist Church Cemetery. The family will receive friends at the funeral home on Wednesday, March 6, 2024, from 2-4 PM and 6-8 PM.

Online condolences may be sent at www.hillsidememorialchapel.com.

Arrangements are in the care and professional direction of Hillside Memorial Chapel & Gardens, Clarkesville, GA. 706-754-6256

Mark Ballew

Mark Ballew, age 55, of Alto, passed away on Friday, March 1, 2024.

Born on July 10, 1968, in Demorest, he was the son of Luther P. Ballew and Laverne Garrett Ballew of Alto. Mr. Ballew was retired from Kubota and was of the Baptist faith. He is remembered as a man of many talents who loved his family.

In addition to his parents, survivors include daughters Hannah Cross and Cassidy Ballew and three grandchildren.

No formal service is planned at this time.

An online guest register is available and may be viewed at www.mcgaheegriffinandstewart.com.

McGahee-Griffin & Stewart Funeral Home of Cornelia, Georgia (706/778-8668) is in charge of arrangements.

U.S. Supreme Court strikes down Colorado 14th Amendment ruling, clearing Trump for ballot

Krista Kafer, a Republican commentator and one of the plaintiffs in a case seeking to bar former President Donald Trump from the 2024 ballot, speaks to the press outside the U.S. Supreme Court following oral arguments in the case on Feb. 8, 2024. (Chase Woodruff/Colorado Newsline)

(Colorado Newsline) — Former President Donald Trump must be placed on Colorado’s 2024 ballot, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Monday, striking down a first-of-its-kind holding by the Colorado Supreme Court that the Republican front-runner is disqualified from office under a Civil War-era insurrection clause.

Trump disqualification

“Because the Constitution makes Congress, rather than the States, responsible for enforcing Section 3 (of the 14th Amendment) against federal officeholders and candidates, we reverse,” justices wrote in the unsigned, “per curiam” opinion.

The ruling — which comes just one day before Colorado holds its presidential primary election on Super Tuesday, March 5 — brings an end to a six-month legal saga that began in Denver District Court and sent shockwaves through American politics during its fast-tracked ascent through the judicial system.

Six Republican and unaffiliated Colorado voters, backed by the nonprofit Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, filed a lawsuit last September alleging that Trump’s actions in relation to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol disqualify him from office under Section 3. The clause prohibits a person who “engaged in insurrection” after taking an oath to support the Constitution from holding office again.

In a 4-3 majority opinion issued Dec. 19, the Colorado Supreme Court sided with the plaintiffs, ordering Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold not to certify Trump’s candidacy for the state’s 2024 Republican presidential primary. The historic ruling, which drew furious condemnations from leading Republicans and even some centrist and liberal commentators, set the stage for similar decisions by Maine’s secretary of state later in December and an Illinois judge last week.

Monday’s ruling will likely result in the reversal of those decisions and spell an end to similar Section 3 challenges in at least a dozen other states, with the justices citing the “disruption” and “chaos” that would ensue if states were allowed to enforce the clause against federal candidates.

Trump said in a radio interview Monday morning that he was “very honored by a nine-to-nothing vote.”

Representatives from CREW said in a press call they were “still digesting” the particulars of the court’s ruling, but faulted the court for taking what they called a “procedural off-ramp” to allow Trump on the ballot.

“The Supreme Court removed an enforcement mechanism, and in letting Trump back on the ballot, they failed to meet the moment,” CREW president Noah Bookbinder said in a statement. “But it is now clear that Trump led the Jan. 6 insurrection, and it will be up to the American people to ensure accountability.”

The Colorado ruling never took effect, because the justices stayed their order pending U.S. Supreme Court review, and Trump still appeared on GOP primary ballots, which were mailed to Colorado voters beginning Feb. 12. Monday’s U.S. Supreme Court ruling ensures that all votes cast by Colorado primary voters for Trump — the overwhelming favorite for his party’s nomination following the withdrawal of nearly all of his major rivals from the race — will be counted.

“I am disappointed in the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision stripping states of the authority to enforce Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for federal candidates,” Griswold wrote on Xfollowing the ruling. “Colorado should be able to bar oath-breaking insurrections from our ballot.”

“In accordance with this decision, Donald Trump is an eligible candidate on Colorado’s 2024 Presidential Primary,” Griswold said.

Court split on enforcement

Though all nine U.S. Supreme Court justices agreed on the outcome of the case, the opinions released Monday show a divide over how far the court should have gone to settle key issues relating to the enforcement of Section 3.

In his appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, Trump’s attorneys challenged the Colorado ruling on a variety of grounds. In addition to arguing that enforcement of Section 3 required an act of Congress, Trump’s team put forward a theory that Section 3’s reference to “officer(s) of the United States” did not include the presidency and disputed claims that the Jan. 6 attack was an “insurrection” and Trump “engaged” in it.

Monday’s ruling is silent on the latter two questions, an outcome that the plaintiffs’ attorneys sought to portray as a victory on Monday.

“The Supreme Court was given the opportunity to exonerate Donald Trump for engaging in insurrection. Donald Trump asked them to exonerate him for engaging in insurrection,” Bookbinder said in a press call. “And they did not do that. There is not a single sentence from a single justice, in that opinion that came out today, taking substantive issue with the findings of the Colorado Supreme Court that Donald Trump engaged in insurrection.”

But five Republican-appointed justices — Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh — appeared to back strict limitations on how the insurrection clause can be enforced. Citing a precedent known as Griffin’s case, an 1869 circuit court opinion authored by Chief Justice Salmon P. Chase, they wrote that it was “necessary” for Congress to enact enforcing legislation pursuant to Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, which states that “Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

“The Constitution empowers Congress to prescribe how those determinations should be made,” the ruling says, referring to the Enforcement Act of 1870 and Section 2383 of the U.S. Code, a statute prescribing a criminal penalty for “rebellion or insurrection,” as appropriate uses of the Section 5 power.

That interpretation appears to rule out the possibility that Section 3 could be enforced by federal courts or by Congress through other means, such as by refusing to seat insurrectionist members or declining to certify the election of an insurrectionist president. In a separate opinion, Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote that she did not join the other conservative justices in deciding that issue. And in a third opinion, the three Democratic-appointed members of the court — Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson — called the majority’s Section 5 findings “as inadequately supported as they are gratuitous.”

“Today, the majority goes beyond the necessities of this case to limit how Section 3 can bar an oathbreaking insurrectionist from becoming President,” the liberal justices wrote. “Although we agree that Colorado cannot enforce Section 3, we protest the majority’s effort to use this case to define the limits of federal enforcement of that provision.”

‘Other avenues’

Following the 14th Amendment’s ratification in 1868, Section 3 was aggressively enforced against hundreds of ex-Confederates for a period of several years. But a series of amnesty measures approved by Congress largely rendered it moot by 1871, and it was enforced in only a handful of cases in the ensuing 150 years.

The unprecedented events of Jan. 6, 2021, when a pro-Trump mob stormed the U.S. Capitol to disrupt the certification of President Joe Biden’s victory in the 2020 election, revived interest in the clause among legal scholars. In another case brought by CREW in 2022, a New Mexico court removed from office a GOP county commissioner who had participated in the attack. Monday’s ruling bars states from enforcing Section 3 against candidates for president or other federal offices, but does not preclude them from enforcing it against state and local officeholders.

Colorado was singled out by CREW as a “good venue” for a 14th Amendment case against Trump because of provisions in its election code requiring only candidates who are eligible to assume office to be placed on the ballot. Challenges in several other states, including Minnesota and Michigan, had been rejected by the courts.

Trump was indicted last year by federal prosecutors who allege that his “pervasive and destabilizing lies” about the 2020 election “targeted a bedrock function of the United States federal government.” That case is still pending, as is a separate election interference case against Trump in Fulton County, Georgia.

In briefs and oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court last month, the Colorado plaintiffs had argued that Section 3, like many other measures in the Constitution, is “self-executing” and that Griffin’s case was wrongly decided. Donald Sherman, CREW’s executive vice president and chief counsel, said Monday that the majority’s interpretation contradicts the consensus view of historians and constitutional scholars.

“The text of Section 3 does not say any of this,” Sherman said. “The majority opinion is reading words into this provision that clearly are not there.”

Proponents of Trump’s disqualification said they will closely scrutinize the court’s opinion and evaluate other ways that Section 3 could be enforced.

“We certainly expect there will be interest in Congress as to whether there is a practical path forward for congressional action,” Bookbinder said. “And we’ll be looking into what other avenues there might be, whether it’s rooted in the 14th Amendment or otherwise, to try to protect democracy from those who have attacked it.”