Home Blog Page 35

Clarkesville amends city charter for millage rate

Clarkesville City Council (Brian Wellmeier/Now Habersham)

On Monday, April 7, Clarkesville City Council approved a minor amendment to the city charter aimed at aligning its property tax structure with that of surrounding municipalities.

The idea was first discussed during a council work session late last year, following a review of the city’s current tax assessment formula. Unlike Habersham County and nearby cities that assess property taxes at 40% of a property’s value, Clarkesville taxed property at 100%.

The amendment won’t change the actual amount residents pay in taxes. Instead, it updates the tax formula to reflect a 40% assessed value—bringing Clarkesville in line with its neighbors. While this adjustment would result in a higher millage rate, the tax bill for residents would stay the same.

A fundamental change to the overall structure of the charter would require approval by a majority (as much as two-thirds) of Georgia’s legislative body. But Clarkesville’s charter contains a specific rule that enables council to make small changes to single line items.

“There’s a provision in the code called the Home Rule, which allows the city to change the charter under certain circumstances,” Clarkesville City Attorney Matt Skilling said. “Under these circumstances – as long as a proposed ordinance is published and notice is provided – over a period of 60 days we can have two consecutive meetings where the ordinance is passed.”

With Monday’s approval, Clarkesville’s millage rate rises to 15 mills, but the amount residents pay does not change.

A mill is equal to $1 per $1,000 in taxable property value, and property is now assessed at 40% of its value in Clarkesville since Monday’s vote.

“It’s a numbers game,” Councilman Brad Coppedge said earlier this year. “It comes to the same number. It’s just, when people see it (at 100%), there’s an immediate perception that people think they’re getting charged more…and it was a request to bring us in alignment with the other municipalities.”

Piedmont women’s golf holds 10-stroke lead after round one at Greenbrier Intercollegiate

(Keith Lucas/Sideline Media 2025)

WHITE SULPHUR SPRINGS, WV. – The Piedmont women’s golf team sits atop the leaderboard at the Greenbrier Intercollegiate Women’s Invitational after round one, holding a 10-stroke lead. Erin Donovan’s one-under 71 was one of two under par rounds in the tournament on day one as she sits in second individually.

Piedmont posted a team score of a 304 in the opening round to sit at +16 in the event, while Southern Virginia is second at +26.

Donovan’s 71 came courtesy of an even par on the front nine and three birdies combatting one double on the back. Donovan birdied 11, 16 & 17 with the stumble on 14.

Goins had no trouble with 14 as she made birdie on it with a total of six birdies in the round. Goins shot two under on the back nine to close out the round strong to finish even on the day and sits in third overall.

Sarah Fox did not shoot higher than a bogey in the round with a 79 to sit in seventh overall while Abigail Evans was also inside the top-15 with an 82 on day one.

Individually, Sydney Richards from Southern Virginia holds the lead shooting a 68 (-4) on Monday.

Up next, the Lions conclude the event with round two on Tuesday.

LIONS ON THE LEADERBOARD:

1 Piedmont University 304
2 Erin Donovan 71
3 Keegan Goins 72
7 Sarah Fox 79
15 Abigail Evans 82

NEED TO KNOW:

Piedmont Leader: 2nd: Erin Donovan, 71 (-1)
As a Team: 1st of 11
Event Information: 11 teams; 54 golfers
The Course: The Greenbrier America’s Resort (White Sulphur Springs, WV.)

Rogers leads Piedmont men’s golf on day one of Capital City Classic

(Derrick Davis/Piedmont Athletic Communications)

PRATTVILLE, AL – Piedmont men’s golf battled rainy conditions and a delayed start and find themselves in 11th place after the first round of the Capital City Classic in Prattville, Alabama.

Finally teeing off after a multi-hour rain delay, junior Adam Rogers paced the Lions with a 1-over 73, making three birdies on his round and nothing worse than bogey to find himself inside the top 20 going into the final day of the event.

As a team, the Lions fired a 303 (+15) team score, counting four rounds in the 70’s. However, Piedmont is just five strokes behind 10th place Wittenberg and six behind ninth-place Sewanee.

In support of Rogers was Jacob DeJesus, who birdie his first and ninth holes of the day on his way to a 3-over 75.

Caleb Vancil carded a 4-over 76 and was the only other Lion except for Rogers to have nothing worse than a bogey on his scorecard.

Connor Lane delivered the final counting score for the Lions, with a 7-over 79 which included a birdie on the par-3 16th hole, his seventh hole of the day.

Doug Gugel produced a non-counting 12-over 84.

Huntingdon sits atop the team leaderboard with a -4 team score, three ahead of Washington & Lee, which was the only other team to shoot under par on Monday.

The tournament is scheduled to conclude with the final round on Tuesday.

LIONS ON THE LEADERBOARD:

(Source: Piedmont Athletic Communications)

NEED TO KNOW:

Piedmont Leader: T-17th – Adam Rogers, 73 (+1)
As a Team: 11th of 18
Event Information: 18 teams; 90 golfers
The Course: RTJ Golf Trail at Capitol Hill (Prattville, AL): Par 72; 7,243yards

Mt. Airy strikes ‘no through trucks’ ordinance, amends abandoned vehicle ordinance

The Mt. Airy Town Council struck the no through truck ordinance from its agenda during its meeting Monday. (Jerry Neace/NowHabersham.com)

The Mt. Airy Town Council removed a controversial proposed “no through truck” ordinance from its agenda Monday night and, instead, focused on amending an existing abandoned vehicle ordinance.

The “no through truck” ordinance had been introduced for a first reading in February after Mayor Ray McAllister and Police Chief Jamie Bowden conducted a drive through several town subdivisions. McAllister explained that the town had received numerous complaints about large trucks, especially 18-wheelers, parking on town right-of-ways where they had no proper place to park.

However, when the ordinance came up for discussion at Monday’s meeting, McAllister requested that it be struck from the agenda. The council agreed and proceeded to the next item on the agenda.

That item was an amendment to the town’s existing abandoned vehicle ordinance. McAllister presented the proposed changes to the ordinance, which had been included in the council members’ meeting packets. With no further discussion, he submitted the amended ordinance for the first reading, and the council approved it.

Click here to read the amended abandoned vehicle ordinance.

The amended ordinance includes a more detailed definition of an abandoned vehicle, which now includes:

  • A vehicle left unattended for more than four hours
  • A vehicle that is inoperable, dismantled, wrecked, or unregistered and left unattended on public property
  • A vehicle left on private property without the owner’s consent for more than 10 days
  • Any commercial truck with a Gross Vehicle Weight Rating (GVWR) exceeding 26,000 pounds, or one primarily used for business purposes, that is parked on a public right-of-way for more than one hour, except when the vehicle is actively engaged in loading, unloading, or providing service

The second reading of the amended abandoned vehicle ordinance is scheduled for the town’s next council meeting on May 5.

Clarkesville approves downtown parking policy for ‘customers only’

Downtown Clarkesville (Daniel Purcell/NowHabersham.com)

Parking changes will be coming to downtown Clarkesville in the coming weeks.

During a work session Monday, April 7, Clarkesville City Council approved a policy change spearheaded by Councilman Brad Coppedge that will apply to businesses and tenants parking on the square. As a downtown business and property owner, Councilwoman Angelia Kiker recused herself from Monday’s vote.

Under the new policy, the 88 spaces on the square will be designated for “customers only,” with business owners, employees and tenants expected to park in any of the 500 (off-square) spots, from Monday-Saturday between the hours of 8 a.m.-6 p.m.

To enforce the new policy, cameras will be installed on the square as city officials monitor vehicles parked for an extended period of time.

Repeated violators will likely be cited with fines ranging from $50-$100 for infractions after multiple warnings.

Now Habersham will have more details on the new policy on Tuesday, April 8.

Markets worldwide take another dive as Trump threatens higher tariffs on China

WASHINGTON (States Newsroom) — Global markets plummeted Monday for the third consecutive trading day since President Donald Trump announced his “Liberation Day” tariffs — and the administration gave mixed signals on meeting other nations at the negotiating table.

U.S. stocks reacted positively to a short-lived, incorrect report amplified on social media that Trump may pause the tariffs for 90 days, but the market plunged quickly when the White House dismissed the claim as “FAKE NEWS.”

Any upward progress was erased upon Trump’s announcement that he planned to further punish China starting Wednesday.

At about 11:15 a.m. Eastern Trump threatened to raise tariffs on China a further 50% if the country does not back down on its retaliatory 34% tax on U.S. imports by Tuesday. If left unresolved, the latest U.S.-China trade war will hit American farmers, particularly soybean producers.

Writing on his platform Truth Social, Trump said “Additionally, all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated! Negotiations with other countries, which have also requested meetings, will begin taking place immediately.”

The administration maintains more than 50 countries have reached out to negotiate.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent wrote on X that Trump has tasked him to negotiate with Japan, which could face a 24% levy beginning Thursday.

“Japan remains among America’s closest allies, and I look forward to our upcoming productive engagement regarding tariffs, non-tariff trade barriers, currency issues, and government subsidies. I appreciate the Japanese government’s outreach and measured approach to this process,” Bessent wrote on the social media platform.

“China has chosen to isolate itself by retaliating and doubling down on previous negative behavior,” Bessent added.

European Union’s stance

Meanwhile, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said she has offered the U.S. zero-for-zero tariffs on industrial goods.

“But we are also prepared to respond through countermeasures and defend our interests,” von der Leyen said Monday at a press conference.

Trump slapped a 20% tax on goods from the EU, set to take effect Thursday, on top of 25% tariffs on steel and aluminum that began in mid-March. A 25% tariff on all foreign cars imported to the U.S. also launched Thursday.

The EU is poised to impose retaliatory duties on American products in response to the import taxes. The bloc of 27 nations is scheduled to vote Wednesday on a list of U.S. goods to be taxed at its borders.

When asked by reporters in the Oval Office Monday if the EU offer was enough to scale back the tariffs, Trump said “No, it’s not.”

Journalists had gathered in the Oval Office for Trump’s meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who visited to discuss Trump’s new 17% tax on his country’s imports.

Netanyahu promised to “eliminate” his country’s trade deficit with the U.S.

“We intend to do it very quickly. We think it’s the right thing to do and we’re going to also eliminate trade barriers, a variety of trade barriers that have been put up unnecessarily. And I think Israel can serve as a model for many countries who ought to do the same,” Netanyahu said.

When asked by reporters if he intends to lower the tariffs on Israel, Trump said, “Maybe not.”

“We give Israel billions of dollars a year,” he added.

The meeting was streamed on C-SPAN.

‘Let’s take the deal’

Two Republican senators publicly urged Trump on social media to take the EU offer.

Sen. Mike Lee of Utah wrote, “Let’s take that deal! Much to gain.”

“Totally agree,” Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin replied. “At some point, you have to take YES for an answer.”

Another Senate Republican, Ted Cruz of Texas, has publicly criticized Trump’s steep levies on almost every nation around the globe.

A bipartisan effort to claw back power from the president’s near-unilateral authority to impose tariffs might not get far despite the economic uncertainty unleashed since Trump unveiled his “Liberation Day” plan.

Legislation co-sponsored by Democrat Maria Cantwell of Washington and Republican Chuck Grassley of Iowa would require the president to notify lawmakers prior to new tariffs from the White House and limit the levies to a 60-day window unless Congress approves an extension.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune of South Dakota seemed to shut down the idea Monday, according to reporters on Capitol Hill.

“I don’t think that has a future. The president has indicated he will veto it. I don’t see how they get it to the floor on the House,” Thune told Politico.

A companion bill in the House is sponsored by Republican Rep. Don Bacon of Nebraska.

Chances of House Speaker Mike Johnson bringing the bill to the floor are likely slim, as the Louisiana Republican supported Trump’s tariff unveiling in person last week.

Supreme Court permits Trump to use wartime law for deportations, for now and with limits

Prisoners look out of their cell as Department of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem tours the Terrorist Confinement Center or CECOT, on March 26, 2025, in Tecoluca, El Salvador. (Photo by Alex Brandon-Pool/Getty Images)

WASHINGTON (States Newsroom) — The U.S. Supreme Court Monday said the Trump administration could continue for now to use the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to carry out rapid deportations of Venezuelans suspected of being gang members — but they must be given a chance to challenge their deportations in court.

The 5-4 decision, which lifted a temporary restraining order by a District of Columbia federal judge, will allow the Trump administration to deport Venezuelans 14 and older who are suspected of Tren de Aragua gang ties, in a victory for the administration of President Donald Trump.

But those immigrants who are subject to the wartime law must have “reasonable notice” in order to challenge their deportation in court “before such removal occurs,” according to the order. The question is which court.

The order argues that the venue of the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia is wrong, and that the challenge, which was originally brought by five men in Texas, should be made in the Lone Star State. The challenge is no longer brought by five men and is now a class action.

“The detainees seek equitable relief against the implementation of the Proclamation and against their removal under the (Alien Enemies Act),” according to the Supreme Court. “They challenge the Government’s interpretation of the Act and assert that they do not fall within the category of removable alien enemies. But we do not reach those arguments.”

The president praised the decision, which did not address the merits of the actual law, on social media.

“The Supreme Court has upheld the Rule of Law in our Nation by allowing a President, whoever that may be, to be able to secure our Borders, and protect our families and our Country, itself,” Trump wrote. “A GREAT DAY FOR JUSTICE IN AMERICA!”

Dissenting justices

The three liberal justices dissented: Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson. The fourth dissent, in part, came from Amy Coney Barrett, who is considered a member of the court’s six-justice conservative majority.

“The Court’s legal conclusion is suspect,” Sotomayor wrote in her dissent.

She added that the majority opinion did not note the harm that could come to the Venezuelans who could face deportation under the Alien Enemies Act. Already, 238 men have been subject to the proclamation and are currently in a brutal mega-prison in El Salvador, the Terrorist Confinement Center or CECOT.

“It does so without mention of the grave harm Plaintiffs will face if they are erroneously removed to El Salvador or regard for the Government’s attempts to subvert the judicial process throughout this litigation,” she said. “Because the Court should not reward the Government’s efforts to erode the rule of law with discretionary equitable relief, I respectfully dissent.”

There is a preliminary injunction hearing against the Trump administration’s use of the Alien Enemies Act Tuesday at 3 p.m. Eastern before U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg. That hearing deals with the administration’s use of the law.

This was the second decision from the high court Monday that sided with the Trump administration.

Earlier, Chief Justice John Roberts decided to temporarily pause a lower court’s order to require the Trump administration to return to the United States a Maryland man wrongly deported to a prison in El Salvador.

Appeal to the high court

The Trump administration March 28 appealed to the Supreme Court after an appeals court declined to do away with the temporary restraining order placed by Boasberg.

Boasberg had extended his temporary restraining order until April 12 to prevent any more deportations of Venezuelan nationals, invoked by Trump with a presidential proclamation on March 14.

The American Civil Liberties Union brought the suit against the Trump administration’s use of the wartime law. The legal organization asked the Supreme Court to keep the temporary restraining order in place because “it is becoming increasingly clear that many (perhaps most) of the men” who were on the March 15 deportation flights to the prison in El Salvador “were not actually members of” the Tren de Aragua and were “erroneously listed” due to their tattoos.

The same day that Boasberg issued his restraining order, on March 15, three deportation flights landed in El Salvador, where 261 men were taken to the mega-prison.

Boasberg has vowed to determine if the Trump administration violated his restraining order by asking for flight details but the Department of Justice has invoked the so-called “state secrets privilege” to block any information.

Four juveniles hurt when UTV overturns

Four juveniles were injured when the utility task vehicle (UTV) they were riding in overturned down a steep embankment, state troopers say.

The accident happened Saturday night, April 5, on private property at 150 Wild Iris Lane in the Macedonia community outside Clarkesville.

According to the Georgia State Patrol’s preliminary crash report, the driver operated the vehicle on rough terrain at a speed “too fast for the steep embankment’s condition.” The UTV overturned and ended up on its side.

All four juveniles were injured in the crash. Habersham and Stephens County EMS transported them to the hospital. Georgia State Patrol Post 7 in Toccoa investigated the crash. The agency did not release the driver’s age or the passengers’.

Troopers clarified in their report that the vehicle was a side-by-side UTV, not an all-terrain vehicle (ATV), as previously reported by the Habersham County Sheriff’s Office.

New juvenile court judges appointed for Mountain Judicial Circuit

Lori Pearson, left, and Angela Highsmith will serve as juvenile court judges for the Mountain Judicial Circuit. Pearson will serve full-time, while Highsmith will be part-time. Both will be sworn in to serve four-year terms beginning May 1, 2025.

Two new juvenile court judges have been selected for the Mountain Judicial Circuit.

Superior Court Chief Judge William Oliver announced Monday that Lori K. Pearson will be sworn in as a full-time judge while Angela J. Highsmith will serve on the bench part-time. Both will begin four-year terms on May 1.

Oliver says Pearson comes to the role with a wealth of legal experience, most recently serving as the Assistant District Attorney assigned to juvenile court. In her new role, she will be responsible for all matters concerning juvenile delinquency, unruly behavior, dependency, and traffic offenses.

Highsmith will be brought on to help manage the growing caseload in the Mountain Judicial Circuit. Her background in family law and commitment to child welfare will be a great asset to the court, says Oliver.

“I am proud to announce the appointment of Lori Pearson and Angela Highsmith to these critical positions within our judicial system,” he says. “Both individuals have demonstrated exceptional legal skills and a deep commitment to serving the families and children of our community. I look forward to seeing the impact they will have in their new  roles.”

The new justices will be sworn into office on May 1 at 4 p.m. at the Habersham County Courthouse. Former Juvenile Court Judge B. Nichole Carswell, who was recently appointed to the superior court bench, will administer the oaths.

The Mountain Judicial Circuit includes Banks, Habersham, Rabun, and Stephens counties in Northeast Georgia.

U.S. House scraps proposal for new-parent proxy voting

Colorado Rep. Brittany Petterson (D-CO) holding her infant son, speaks from the House floor. She was among the congressional members pushing for new-parent proxy voting. (livestream image)

WASHINGTON (States Newsroom) — U.S. House Speaker Mike Johnson and Florida Rep. Anna Paulina Luna struck a deal this weekend to avoid a floor vote that likely would have changed the chamber’s rules and given new parents the ability to vote by proxy for 12 weeks.

Johnson and Luna, both Republicans, plan to use “vote pairing” — where two members on opposite sides of an issue agree to cancel out each other’s votes, typically because one lawmaker cannot make it to the floor to vote — rather than move forward with a bipartisan proposal to allow new parents to vote remotely.

The deal represented progress for Johnson, who saw the issue torpedo the House agenda last week, though Democrats weren’t on board as of Monday.

“Speaker Johnson and I have reached an agreement and are formalizing a procedure called ‘live/dead pairing’—dating back to the 1800s—for the entire conference to use when unable to physically be present to vote: new parents, bereaved, emergencies,” Luna posted on social media.

While GOP lawmakers could pair with other members of their own party if they planned to vote differently on a bill, the plan would likely need Democratic buy-in to work on party-line votes.

Democrats disappointed

Colorado Rep. Brittany Pettersen and California Rep. Sara Jacobs, both Democrats, issued statements expressing disappointment with Luna for no longer pushing forward with the discharge petition that was set to force a floor vote this week on the rule change.

“When Speaker Johnson refused to bring our resolution to the floor for a vote — regardless of how many Members supported it — we followed the rules and tried to force a vote by filing a discharge petition and received the necessary signatures to bring it forward,” Pettersen wrote. “Instead of letting us vote, he has instead gone to historic lengths to kill our resolution and make sure the large majority of his Members don’t have a voice. Let’s be clear: these changes are not a win for us and Speaker Johnson has turned his back on moms and dads in Congress and working families.”

Jacobs wrote the agreement Johnson and Luna reached wouldn’t “support new parents so they can do their jobs and vote on behalf of their constituents while also taking care of themselves and their families.”

“I won’t accept the way Congress has always done things, and the American people won’t either,” Jacobs wrote. “We will keep pushing for innovative ways to support young people and parents in Congress – including by modernizing how we vote – even if it takes a Democratic majority to do so.”

Jacobs, Luna, Pettersen and their allies from both parties were able to defeat a maneuver from Johnson last week that would have set aside their discharge petition. In response to the defeat, Johnson sent the House home for the week on Tuesday.

Floor vote avoided

Had Luna and Johnson not struck a deal this weekend, House rules would have allowed her to force a floor vote this week on the bipartisan Proxy Voting for New Parents Resolution.

The discharge petition to bring it up for a vote held signatures from 218 House members, indicating it had the support needed to change the chamber’s rules.

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said during a press conference Monday that he “hadn’t had the opportunity to fully evaluate this proposal and/or talk with Rep. Pettersen or Rep. Sarah Jacobs, who have been the leaders of this effort on our side.”

“And so I’m going to refrain from commenting on the proposal until I’ve had those conversations and the opportunity to review this so-called agreement,” Jeffries said, before adding he didn’t understand why so many GOP lawmakers were opposed to allowing proxy voting for new parents.

“The question has to be raised: What is the Republican problem with allowing expectant mothers or new mothers to vote on behalf of their constituents?” Jeffries asked. “This seems like a very strange hill for them to die on legislatively.”

Banks County deputies’ conduct under question after remarks made in video

A video allegedly shows Banks County officers making disparaging remarks on camera (Cierra Cruce/Facebook)

The Banks County Sheriff’s Office has released a statement following a viral video that appears to show deputies allegedly using disparaging remarks about a young boy during an incident at a home on Blacks Creek Church Road.

The Banks County Sheriff’s Office has since launched an internal review in the wake of the incident, which is said to have occurred on March 25.

The reason officers were at the home at the time remains unclear, and Now Habersham has filed open records request with the sheriff’s office for more information.

In the video, taken from a camera mounted to the home, officers and individuals dressed in civilian clothing are seen standing on the front porch making remarks like “trashy” before referring to someone as “looking like the offspring of the banjo player in ‘Deliverance'” – a film about men who stalk and attack four vacationers on a trip in the Northeast Georgia mountains.

In a caption posted with the video, a woman named Cierra Cruce claims the remarks were directed at a young male child. The video is abruptly ended within a minute of when it started after one of the men, with officers observing, says: “Where’s the cameras at? Disconnect that damn thing. They don’t need to know what we’re doing.”

A man dressed in civilian clothing then rips the camera off its mount before the video ends.

“On April 6…the Banks County Sheriff’s Office became aware of a video circulating on social media involving our deputies,” the sheriff’s office said in a statement on Facebook. “We want to assure the public that we are actively reviewing the footage and taking this matter seriously. As an agency, we are committed to upholding the values of professionalism, respect, integrity, dependability and empathy in all aspects of our work. The safety, trust and well-being of our community remain our top priorities.”

The statement goes on to say: “While we cannot provide specific details at this time due to the sensitive nature of the individuals involved, we are conducting a thorough internal review to ensure all actions align with our policies and standards. We appreciate the public’s understanding and patience…”